Laserfiche WebLink
consistent with current and previous regulations and zoning since prior to the establishment <br />of the Comprehensive Plan. It is a straight site plan which meets the code. Condominium <br />units fit within RM -4 zoning and are appropriate. They have submitted for administrative <br />approval a plan to pull the pool behind the 1987 CCCL and the only improvement east of the <br />1987 CCCL would be a dune access path that would be similar to what is constructed with <br />single family residences. It is a full 150 feet from the right-of-way line on AIA. The <br />building code sets forth the building height requirements and the project is in compliance. <br />The final architectural design documents will be, he thought, very specifically reviewed and <br />y6 <br />F <br />it will meet the 35 -foot height limit presently in effect. He offered to answer questions. <br />In response to Commissioner Adams and others, Mr. McGuire indicated on the site <br />plan where and how the 7 units would be located above the garages, which provide the <br />footprint for the structure. <br />Mr. Evans addressed the two relevant issues, fire and elevation, that were discussed <br />extensively at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Should the Commission have <br />any questions of Chief Dietz, he hoped they would take advantage of the fact that he was in <br />the audience. For the record, he adopted the presentation offered by the County in this <br />quasi-judicial hearing on behalf of the applicant. He also wished to include in the record the <br />drawing by staff as well as the letter from the Fire Department. He then reviewed the <br />standard of a quasi-judicial proceeding that there is substantial competent evidence upon <br />which the Board could base its decision and, with due respect, he hoped the Commissioners <br />would not take into consideration the testimony by Mr. Glynn as he felt Mr. Glynn was only <br />able to give his personal and emotional feeling about what this may do to the scenic road or <br />his neighborhood. He hoped the Board would weigh the evidence and would consider staff's <br />recommendation and that the project had been moved landward of the 1987 CCCL. He <br />believed it was clear that the LDR requirements have been met without compromise other <br />than the conditions attached to the site plan. He requested they add one more condition that <br />April 3, 2001 <br />70 <br />