Laserfiche WebLink
9.A.1. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-017 - <br />AMENDMENT TO AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION REGULATIONS OF <br />LDR SECTIONS 911.06(4) AND 913.06(5) (Legislative) <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE <br />IN [HE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of April 1, 2002 and <br />explained how the affidavit of exemption would affect properties whether in or out of the <br />urban service area. <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />r—/ <br />Robert M. Keating, <br />Community Development Director <br />A_ /C. <br />FROM: Stan Bohm?, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: April 1, 2002 <br />SUBJECT: Request to Amend the Affidavit of Exemption Regulations of LDR <br />Sections 911.06(4) and 913.06(5) <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given foiuial consideration by the Board <br />of County Commissioners at its meeting of April 9, 2002. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Last summer and fall, county staff, the Professional Services Advisory Committee <br />(PSAC), the Planning_ and Zoning Commission (P7C), and the Board of County <br />Commissioners (Board) considered changes to the county's affidavit of exemption <br />regulations to allow affidavits of exemption on agriculturally designated lands (lands <br />located outside of the Urban Service Arca). Those proposed changes were initiated by <br />staff based upon comprehensive plan amendments that went into etfect in June 2001. At <br />that time. staff, the PSAC, and the PZC recommended that the Board approve those <br />proposed changes <br />On October 23. 2001, the Board considered those proposed changes, but agreed with <br />some concerns raised by Deputy County Attorney Will Collins. One of those concerns <br />April 9, 2002 <br />33 <br />• <br />