My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/21/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
5/21/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:49:09 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:40:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
05/21/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2557
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />is one of the county's largest employment centers. Most people who work in that node live in <br />moderately -priced, low to medium density housing. The RM -6 zoning district is intended for such <br />housing. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in that <br />node to live near their job, thus reducing the length of their trips to and from work. For this reason, <br />the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4. <br />Transportation Element Obiechve 11 and Policy 11.1 <br />Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 state that the county will increase densities in <br />the urbanized area and along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass transit <br />provision. Since the proposed rezoning will increase the allowed density along and near several <br />major transportation corridors this request implements Transportation Element Objective 11 and <br />Policy 11.1 <br />Consistency Summary <br />As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all appropriate objectives <br />and policies in the plan and found no conflicts Therefore, staff's position is that the request is <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Staff's position is that the requested zoning district is appropriate for the site and that development <br />under this zoning district would be compatible with surrounding land uses Because land directly <br />to the east of the subject property is zoned RM -6, this request is for a continuation of an existing <br />multiple -family residential zoning pattern. <br />The Walker Avenue Club apartment complex on 26`h Street west of the subject property is also zoned <br />RM -6. Multiple -family and mobile home zoning and development are already prominent along both <br />sides of 26t Street, west of 58t Avenue. <br />Consistent with the comprehensive plan, the proposed rezoning implements an incremental transition <br />in zoning districts. This transition is accomplished by placing multiple -family districts between <br />single-family districts and commercial/industrial districts or major roads. <br />Located near the SR 60/58` Avenue commercial/industrial node (which includes the Indian River <br />Mall), the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for multiple -family housing <br />generated by development within that node. In effect, the proposed rezoning would increase the <br />opportunity for people to live near their place of employment. <br />Development of the subject property would be expected to have little or no impact on the Vista <br />Plantation Condominiums to the south. That project, zoned RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential <br />District (up to 4 units/acre), contains a vegetative buffer, golf course and ponds along its north <br />boundary, which is 26th Street. <br />Similarly, incompatibilities between the subject property and adjacent A-1 zoned land are not <br />anticipated. The A-1 zoned land immediately to the west of the subject property is within the Urban <br />Service Area is designated L-2 and is expected to be eventually converted to residential uses. <br />With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural zoning on property <br />located within the Urban Service Area rather than changing it when the underlying land use <br />designation changes This not only reflects the county's policy of using agricultural zoning within <br />the Urban Service Area as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that urbanization occurs <br />incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods. <br />MAY 21, 2002 <br />-33- <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.