Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />5. Reduces the burden of impact and user fees on building contractors and homeowners <br />when a service must be provided under the County s Comprehensive Plan. <br />6. Debt burden is reduced: A steady stream of revenue for capital projects reduces the need <br />to rely upon outside debt as a funding source, as well as the resultant interest expenses <br />incurred. Generally, bond issues and other forms of debt, and their issuance and <br />borrowing costs, often increase property taxes or impact revenue streams which are <br />needed for the County's operating expenses. Certainly any way that the County can <br />realistically reduce reliance upon outside debt as a revenue source is desirable. <br />7. Cities and County Share Revenue: The sales tax is not just received by the County. All <br />municipalities receive a proportionate share of the sales tax for their infrastructure needs <br />The distribution is based upon the formula established in Chapter 218.62, Florida <br />Statutes. <br />Future Capital Projects -Prioritization of Projects <br />As stated earlier, the original voter referendum only extended the Local Option One Cent Sales <br />Tax until 2004. As the population of our County continues to increase the sales tax will prove <br />an advantageous way to fund the necessary projects and services that our expanded populace will <br />require for its safety and well-being. <br />Recently, the County Administrator's Office asked the Departments to analyze the County's <br />infrastructure needs over the coming years and submit proposals from their perspective. When <br />this analysis was complete projects totaling over $150 million in combined capital expenditures <br />were submitted for the Administrator's review. This office then reviewed and rated these projects <br />according to urgency. <br />Of the over $150 million in capital requests originally submitted, only $61 million in revenues <br />are available in the first frve years to fund the submitted projects. Projects considered having the <br />highest priority were included for funding in this first five year period. Some of the less critical <br />projects will be considered for funding in the second or third five year periods in the context of <br />the County s infrastructure needs in that future time. <br />A preliminary schedule of proposed projects for the first five year period, October 151, 2004 - <br />September 30`h, 2009 is on file in the BCC office. This schedule provides a brief description of <br />each project and its originating department, as well as estimated construction costs and operating <br />expenses over this five year period (Operating expenditures are not funded by this tax, and are <br />included for information purposes only). <br />Larger Projects under consideration for the period October 1, 2004 -September 30, 2009 <br />Highlighted below is a tentative list of some of the larger projects under consideration in the <br />2004-2009 period. This is by no means a final list, rather it is submitted merely for discussion <br />purposes. <br />1. More people bring more vehicles, and so road and bridge projects remain a high priority. <br />The 43`d Avenue comdor is slated for expansion to 4 lanes from 8`h to 26th Streets, to <br />address increasing traffic congestion and accidents in that area ($2,000,000). Bridges at <br />the Lateral A Canal, east of 66t Avenue are in critical need of repair ($5,000,000). In the <br />North County, residents there can benefit from left turn lane improvements at the <br />intersections of a number of streets and heavily traveled 58th Avenue (estimated cost, <br />$900 000), and a proposed four lane widening of County Road 512 ($1,000,000). In total, <br />$19,400,000 will be needed from Optional Sales Tax for road improvement projects over <br />the next five years <br />MAY 21, 2002 <br />-47- <br />75 <br />