My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
6/18/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:45:27 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:41:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
06/18/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2557
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Should we build a single structure or several buildings (campus style)? <br />COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: One administration building with an annex in close <br />proximity. <br />4. What location best satisfies the overall project requirements? (See attached proposed <br />County Administration building sites). <br />COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: To remain at the present site and acquire the <br />necessary additional land north of the present County Administration Building for the <br />project, as illustrated in the SpiIlis Candella Report. <br />OTHER COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS <br />5. Final allocation of staff requirements for the year 2020 be the County Administrator's <br />call, based upon guidance received from the Committee. <br />6. Future expansion be designed into the project in the initial phase. <br />7. The County hire a dedicated project manager who is technically oriented to coordinate <br />the project, that he be on board in the design stage, and that the County should begin the <br />process of selecting an architect. <br />8. The County include Arts in Public Places as a separate budget item. <br />9. The buildings be designed to include high-tech features. <br />10. A moveable partitioning system be used in general office space to provide adequate <br />natural light and simplify lighting and HVAC systems. (The Committee especially liked the <br />TEKNION partitions it saw at Osceola County's Administration Building) <br />11. Local architects, engineers and contractors be given preferred consideration either <br />individually or in a partnership with an out -of -County firm, as permitted by Florida Statutes. <br />12. The County Administration Building not contain any facilities that would serve as <br />competition to the private sector, except for a limited service cafeteria <br />13. The building shall be efficient, functional, flexible, practical, easily maintained, <br />inviting durable, safe and cost-effective. Interior spaces should be welcoming of the public <br />and an exciting and pleasant environment for County employees. A landscape setting that <br />takes advantage of our subtropical climate with well -landscaped grade level parking in <br />reasonable proximity of the building entrances. A building that enlightens the cultural <br />senses of our community and one that would be a pleasant experience to visit, whether or <br />not one has business with the County. Finally, a building that is not exalted, but has an <br />image of restrained dignity. <br />14. An extension of 20th Avenue north- to Aviation Boulevard be mandatory if the project <br />remains at its current location. <br />15 The County retain ownership of the 7+ acres, which now comprise the present <br />Administration Building and parking lots. The building should be razed because of on-going <br />high maintenance costs and liability concerns. The razed area could be used as open space, a <br />park or space for future needs. <br />The County should notify the School District as soon as possible, in writing, of its future <br />plans for the current site. The current lease held by the School District, executed <br />June 18, 2002 <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.