My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/5/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
6/5/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 9:04:42 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:22:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
06/05/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2277
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1-4 <br /> MCI SHERIFF DEPARTMENT EVIDENCE STORAGE <br /> ADDITION - DOW , HOWELL , GILMORE ASSOCIATES , <br /> INC . - ARCHITECTS FOR DESIGN AND <br /> CONSTRUCTION SERVICES <br /> The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 29 , 2001 : <br /> Date : May 29, 2001 <br /> To : The Honorable Board of County Commissioners <br /> Thru : James E . Chandler, County Administrator ) <br /> From : Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director �GU . <br /> Subject: Agreement with Dowe Howell * GilmoreeAssociates, Inc., Architects for <br /> Design and Constructions Services for an Addition to the Indian River <br /> County Sheriff' s Department for Evidence Storage <br /> EXHIBIT : Proposed Negotiated Architectural Agreement <br /> BACKGROUND : <br /> Pursuant to the requirements of the Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act, the Board of County <br /> Commissioners on June 13 , 2000, approved the selection of Dow, Howell , Gilmore, Associates , Inc . , <br /> Architects as the selected design professional for the Sheriff' s evidence storage expansion . As such, staff <br /> was authorized to negotiate with Dow Howell Gilmore for professional services related to the design and <br /> construction of the Sheriffs Evidence Storage expansion . <br /> Subsequently, a meeting for negotiations was held with representatives of Dow, Howell , Gilmore . A <br /> period of time progressed due to expanded desires by the Sheriff' s Department for additional remodeling <br /> associated with the evidence storage . Since there was a limited amount of funding provided for this <br /> particular work, it was decided to allow the newly elected Sheriff to give direction . It was finally decided <br /> to continue with the basic expansion as originally proposed. <br /> After negotiations in mid-December, an agreement was reached which provides basically for a fee of <br /> 12 .4% of construction costs based on a construction cost estimate of $ 185 . 000 or $22 ,950 in architectural <br /> fees plus a not to exceed $9,250 for site plan and water management permit modification approvals for a <br /> total of $32 ,200 ( 17 .4%) . <br /> Funding in the amount of $250,000 from the one-cent sales tax revenue has been previously approved by <br /> the Board . <br /> RECOMENDATION : <br /> Staff submits that the proposed architectural agreement with Dow, Howell , Gilmore, Associates, Inc . , <br /> Architects is fair and reasonable and recommends Board approval subject to the County Attorney ' s final <br /> review and approval . <br /> JUNE 5 , 2001 I t1; <br /> - 108 - <br /> 71 <br /> J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.