|
a , "r; . d,., a ,. �} ''" _�' l�fi," e.�. . .r.- .,.a, � .3 .: .#^a v L. .-,R � 4 ]^ s
<br /> ^+r s,s "• 'r" � ,+ fs ,m„#,'. '�. . .,?.,.,. 'Y
<br /> . .`x :.-s . . < r . '� .. , ?E� R , ^: .. . v.... :�.. .,. a m E< .w. . ;::. .. . � - . '.;
<br /> s .. '�. - . ,. _ . ., Q��:` . _av, 3r intik„ .. ., � ,. a.✓..
<br /> hss r- . Pt.. r - . . v p< , , ,: .�. 4. ✓ . . .,:. .. <. . , :.:. rU,... . , :v* * ,: , v;'. f
<br /> , .,«, ,,,. `F a ,r . .. ?t - t, „z .n „a,. ., k x..., ... . . .:,.A'u ,..,E $ . aa, 'w ta, ^!s:P t f v .:.
<br /> ..
<br /> h
<br /> {� ...: .
<br /> ,e...f
<br /> . o ..-, s.
<br /> e' ��'�' y � �'&��. � ; ..'� ,•+ �N <�g<< fe :. `# "& ��€„ � � � ”' tw < . - � „S,'+ 9 `-�tk'.
<br />' • r � vg d. , � _,: elr �r,t . e ' �c:
<br /> < Nf
<br /> y�
<br /> 5
<br /> The proposed additions and deletions to the plan are shown in Attachment 2 . In this attachment,
<br /> deletions are indicated by 3'=rxe7tnhTrv- u- - g-m' - , while additions are shown as double underlined .
<br /> On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to 6 to I to recommend that the Board
<br /> of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment with the addition , by reference , of
<br /> definitions of cultural organizations . That recommendation has been incorporated into Attachment
<br /> 2 .
<br /> On May 17 , 2001 , the Professional Services Advisory Committee voted 9 to 0 recommend that the
<br /> Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment .
<br /> ANALYSIS `
<br /> This section will present an analysis of the reasonableness of the proposed amendment, followed by
<br /> a discussion of the consistency of the proposed amendment with the comprehensive plan . 1
<br /> ANALYSIS OF REASONABLENESS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT
<br /> An objective and its policies form an "objective cluster. ” The proposed new objective cluster
<br /> establishes a framework to guide county decisions about culture and the arts .
<br /> The proposed new objective is measurable and achievable . Directly related to achieving the
<br /> objective, the proposed new policies are actions that the county can take to support arts and culture
<br /> in the county . It is important to note that the proposed policies do not support any particular
<br /> organization . In fact, they are specifically worded to refer to all county cultural organizations . t
<br /> ,
<br /> Finally , no changes to any existing policies or procedures are required to implement the proposed
<br /> policies . For these reasons , the proposed amendment is reasonable .
<br /> CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
<br /> Staff reviews each comprehensive plan amendment request for consistency with all applicable
<br /> policies of the comprehensive plan . As per Section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the county code , the
<br /> "comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of
<br /> the plan pursuant to Section 163 . 3177 ( 2 ) F. S .
<br /> The goals , objectives and policies are the most important pans of the comprehensive plan . Policies
<br /> are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the 1,
<br /> community ' s development. As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
<br /> basis for all county land development related decisions -- including plan amendment decisions .
<br /> While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in
<br /> reviewing plan amendment requests . Future Land Use Element Policy 14. 3 , however, is applicable
<br /> to all plan amendment requests . For that reason , this section will begin with a discussion of how the
<br /> proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
<br /> Future Land Use Element Policv 14.3
<br /> t "
<br /> f
<br /> In evaluating any comprehensive plan text amendment request, the most important consideration is
<br /> Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that at least one of three criteria be met
<br /> in order to approve a comprehensive plan text amendment. These criteria are : el
<br /> • the proposed amendment corrects a mistake in the approved plan ;
<br /> • the proposed amendment corrects an oversight in the approved plan ; or
<br /> • the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances .
<br /> JUNE 59 20011
<br /> - 50 -
<br /> ,rvu w.� ..''", s{ ,f + ,"'y ; Tt' �' rf ,s .�#.. . tpt�. , 5 " �'. : `::. t ,'„+? a t „r: - : X . :.t . '��`:
<br /> . 1 > ass x ✓,F.z + �.�. �,... 4 r
<br /> y:!Y,. . ,..- .... Y. , ,T aµ. x s � �,.x ,_,� &'�' ,..a• . ,:w Kr :�. I. ,r.,, . R 5 a .,..Y G :f .. .m,
<br /> ew ,. � i -'. r --'' -. . -. s, :x t «wy=. N ,:'s' .P „�S•. � 'a '!ti" :fir : :', . �< ,
<br /> :4 ? +„pd.;. . 'i�... . ' "a :ID�W. : *s,$i 'x„ _ . ,�:_ .. :fx*..s, gsi, ,v,.„;.. v, b£t,v x u v e'h x` ..„,, ..- s �,
<br />r �,'” � , � �: ,+ x ,c kv"s . r t +,. k .,N.�✓ ,: r �,`- .
<br /> , i � . L ... � :� . , � . ; e .« . .,. an ,. s,. ✓k`p: :,t t x:. .yR r : . ..., ti i; u n , a .. a` . ,
<br />....,-. a „ ry. , < s } .::`: P Y 4 h a a ''�4'� a. x�r . ':s,.c >S .
<br /> :.,,? ... .n � ? »•. a WS':" K. :� .. ..:.. , h -m rs.: a.,:� , hs '4. ., t~ ;.; ,. -, 3
<br />i _.-,. x a . - r ..:: . ,^,r*- a - .. ,.r t .. .:. .±s «'.
<br /> s7i :� ,� i. . _ _ - • ,: ✓� i- . :r, "} } +-"b�� �, t `r .e. . k . � �.,. . tf hf ::� sY 9 ..-: ...sA
<br /> � �' Ma`s, ,:? he 5W'. -+� F""y *.. 's
<br /> t,.,$mr . tr .H, y.; < x ^P ���:a9.��.� "�i§�z�.�. .,..v.KSt. �:.-a--5a: R"d.,. sr...a:.rr •....w�:,,:au . 6.,,+, v. .�.. :.. . ,. u. . _r. .
<br /> s , t ..'err:. , ,. , . t . .v,.,r :.xo. ,. :..« _ ,. . ax x % . ac . .� :, 3=t: alr,kn x« �: >,., . m�i�,u,,:.,sys°L.'� }c.5�.,i
<br />r . . s. h. ., ..n � . .s. a ,. , � ;
<br />
|