My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/16/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
7/16/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:40:11 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:42:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
07/16/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2558
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Passing the concurrency test justifies the proposed land use amendment only ifthe proposed land use <br />designation is consistent with all other comprehensive plan policies and compatible with surrounding areas <br />In Indian River County, available capacity for services does not dictate development patterns; rather, the <br />comprehensive plan dictates the location of services. <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan may only <br />be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section <br />163.3177(2), F.S." Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses as <br />depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which mcludes agricultural, residential recreational, conservation, <br />and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are <br />statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's <br />development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county <br />land development decisions including plan amendment decisions While all comprehensive plan policies <br />are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment requests. Of <br />particular applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies: <br />Urban Service Area Expansion Policy <br />In the past two years, the Board of County Commissioners has spent considerable time addressing the issue <br />of urban service area expansion. This issue arose with the January, 2000 Clontz comprehensive plan <br />amendment request, and was resolved with the October, 2001 plan amendment establishing a T, <br />Transitional, land use designation category. <br />The adoption ofthat land use designation established the county's urban service area expansion policy. <br />After considering several alternatives, including one which would have expanded the urban service area <br />boundary to include the subject Buettell property and other land bordering roads having utility lines and <br />serving as urban service area boundaries, the Board set a narrow urban service area expansion policy <br />That policy allows urban service area expansion only for properties abutting a commercial/industrial node <br />where that node is more than 70% developed. <br />Although the subject property does abut a commercial/industrial node, that node is only 25% developed. <br />Therefore, this request is not consistent with the county's urban service area expansion policy. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 <br />One of the most important policies to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with <br />the county's Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that at <br />least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria are: <br />• the proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; <br />• the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; <br />• the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites, and that <br />swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the <br />Future Land Use Map, or <br />• the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the <br />subject property. <br />JULY 16, 2002 <br />-69- <br />t ) i 0 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.