My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/23/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
7/23/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:31:01 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:43:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
07/23/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2558
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mim <br />lqt <br />thought the partnership could be good but there could be new players down the road who <br />could change everything; a master plan would provide a level of comfort. This property will <br />have a visual impact five miles down the highway and the visual impact of Indian River <br />County must look good. She intended to help them make it look good. <br />Commissioner Macht believed the most important feature of the property to be the <br />northeast corner. He hoped that industrial development of some significance could result <br />because the County needs an industrial park in the worst way. <br />Mr. Little commented that he told Mr Miliege in the very beginning: "There will <br />never be another Vero Lake Estates." He had specified that the infrastructure and roads will <br />be in place in advance. <br />There was a brief discussion as to how to proceed. Commissioner Adams suggested <br />a letter stating that the Commission agrees in principal. They could still send the letter with <br />staffs concerns. <br />Chairman Stanbridge suggested that they add to the new letter that they would all be <br />working together to make the plan for this property work for the City and for future plans. <br />Commissioner Ginn credited Mike Busha of the TCRPC and advised that he had <br />offered help to Fellsmere. They would be willing to do a charette. Her two concerns had <br />to do with traffic, particularly that all traffic did not spill onto CR512, and that there would <br />be another roadway out to the west. She also specified that some kind of grid be maintained. <br />The corner portion of commercial industrial seemed excessive to her. She asked the status <br />of the 4-laning of CR512 and was advised it has not been scheduled yet west of I-95. This <br />could accelerate the need. <br />Vice Chairman Tippin saw this as an opportunity for economic development and a <br />partnership to work with the developer. <br />July 23, 2002 <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.