My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/9/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
7/9/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:28:34 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:42:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
07/09/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2558
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Director Davis gave a brief history on a previous Board approval for culvert <br />installation in Vero Lake Estates. <br />Director Davis then read from a letter Mrs. Leck gave him. She had been present <br />earlier, but had to leave the meeting. In her letter, Mrs. Leck commented that everyone <br />could have a "medical issue" because an emergency could result from an accident or heart <br />attack or stroke for which immediate attention is required. She also raised the issue of <br />County rights-of-way and felt it was not right for the County to take away residents' access <br />to a paved street. She felt her tax money was just as good as that of a person living on <br />another street and she should have a culvert, too. She related a story of a shed burning <br />because the fire truck was unable to reach it quickly. Their homeowner's insurance policy <br />premiums are affected by location and access to fire hydrants. They are experiencing <br />mosquito problems because the canal does not drain and has 2 feet of stagnant water at any <br />given time. She also spoke about well contamination, roadway needing work, and how their <br />vehicles are taking a beating. <br />Director Davis explained that 86th Street was not a road just a right-of-way -- but <br />actually a grass trail. <br />Commissioner Adams understood that staff had recommended against this because <br />they do not know how many more similar requests would be generated at a cost of <br />approximately $9,000 each. <br />Director Davis advised there could be another 4 or 5 requests. <br />In response to Chairman Stanbridge, Director Davis explained that the MSTU <br />generates about $60,000 a year. If this one is approved, it could come out of the MSTU <br />money. Some of the MSTU money has been used for the project, but fortunately the County <br />had received almost a million dollars in grants for the project. He explained the process if <br />the Board wanted to generate more money into the MSTU. <br />July 9, 2002 <br />55 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.