My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/13/2002 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
8/13/2002 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:03:50 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:45:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/13/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2561
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In response to Commissioner Macht who thought this had already been done, <br />Community Development Director Robert Keating explained the changes that had been <br />made. He advised implementation of Commissioner Adams' suggestion would require LDR <br />amendments. Director Keating also pointed out that solid waste fees are due at C.O. He <br />suggested a financing system might be used. <br />Commissioner Adams wanted assurance that the process would be easier for the small <br />developer and not harder. <br />Discussion ensued which included traffic study timing, reservation of capacity (which <br />occurs when the traffic impact fee is paid), and other pertinent issues and information. <br />Assistant Administrator Baird proposed that the County could provide short-term <br />financing to small businesses under a simple agreement. He acknowledged that such an <br />agreement and procedure would be quicker than a LDR amendment He specified that the <br />procedure must include specific definitions, such as the threshold size for developments <br />entitled to such financing. The financing agreement would be signed simultaneously with <br />the issuance of the permit. <br />Assistant Administrator Baird believed this change could be effectuated quickly and <br />staff could come back with something for the Board to consider. It would be a simple <br />agreement authorizing staff to have authority up to a certain amount. <br />CONSENSUS was reached that such an agreement be drafted and brought back as <br />soon as possible to the Board for consideration. <br />August 13, 2002 <br />57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.