My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/6/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
8/6/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:24:43 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:43:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
08/06/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2558
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(c) Final development order. These are development orders which authorize <br />construction of a new building, expansion of an existing building, increase in <br />intensity of use, or change of use which requires a new CO (certificate of <br />occupancy). The final development order will be issued as a building permit. <br />Concurrency determination is automatic at this stage fora developments having <br />an initial development orders is automatic if the application meets the <br />requirements of section 910.08(1) and if the applicant has a valid initial <br />concurrency certificate determination. Any development order such as single- <br />family building permit which does not require an initial development order will <br />not be issued until the applicant acquires a final concurrency determination <br />certificate. <br />(2) The following are exempted from concurrency review: <br />(3) <br />(a) <br />Projects which have a vested rights determination pursuant to section 910.03; <br />(b) Existing nonresidential buildings to be modified, altered, or repaired unless the <br />modification will increase squarefootageand increase the intensity of use. Where <br />existing projects (residential or nonresidential) seek expansion which will increase <br />the number of dwelling units or square footage for nonresidential projects, only <br />the net increase or expansion shall be subject to concurrency review; <br />Vested final subdivision plats to be modified unless modification creates <br />additional lots; <br />(c) <br />(d) Developments with a final development order proceeding to completion; <br />(e) Replacement of existing residential units unless there is an increase in number of <br />units; and <br />(0 Any development orders, including land use amendments and rezoning <br />applications, which do not increase density or intensity of use. <br />The designation of a single agency for coordinating each level of the concurrency <br />determination review process is necessary to ensure that every concurrency determination <br />application is reviewed in accordance with these regulations prior to the issuance of a <br />development order. The community development department shall be responsible for <br />coordinating the review of the development applications identified in section 910.07(1) <br />and for approving or rejecting concurrency determinations The community development <br />director shall initiate the review process by review of an application for completeness and <br />data sufficiency within three (3) days of receipt of the application. A copy of the complete <br />application will then be forwarded to the evaluating agencies. <br />Upon submission, each concurrency determination application will be placed in a queue. <br />Each application will then be evaluated in the order in which it was received As each <br />application is evaluated, the demand reflected by that application will be compared to the <br />available capacity for each facility, as described in sections 910.08, 910.09 and 910.11. <br />As demand is allocated by approving applications, available capacity will be reduced. <br />If in any facility has insufficient capacity is -available to accommodate the a proposed <br />application, the following will occur: <br />(a) If the applicant has indicated on his application that he would accept Less capacity <br />than requested if available capacity is inadequate to accommodate his demand, <br />then he will be allocated the remaining available capacity and the concurrency <br />certificate will be conditioned on a comparable reduction in project simi•� <br />AUGUST 6, 2002 92 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.