8/6/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• (4) (5) (b) If the applicant has indicated on his application that he would not accept less capacity than requested if available capacity is inadequate to accommodate his demand, then his application request will be denied. The following departments shall be responsible for evaluating the adequacy of existing and planned facilities with regard to concurrency mer on applications: (a) The utilities department shall evaluate solid waste levels of service; (b) The public works department - .. shall evaluate roadway levels of service; (c) The public works department shall evaluate drainage levels of service; (d) The utilities department shall evaluate potable water levels of service; (e) The utilities department shall evaluate sanitary sewer levels of service; and (f) The community development department shall evaluate park levels of service. The evaluating agencies, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the application from the community development department, shall provide the coordinating agency a letter or other instrument for each concurrency determination application. The evaluating agencies shall assess the level of service for all facilities which will be impacted by the proposed development determine the extent of the impact generated by the proposed development, and determine whether those facilities have sufficient capacity to serve the development at, or above, adopted levels of service. The applicant shall meet all the requirements of the evaluating agencies in order to be eligible for approval of the concunency - • application. No concurrency certificate determination will be approved until each evaluating agency is satisfied that sufficient capacity is available to accommodate the demand represented by the application. The applicant, through an enforceable development agreement with the evaluating agency, may mitigate deficiencies in order to satisfy the concurrency review. (6) The coordinating agency will be responsible for compiling the level of service reviews into a concurrency report within five (5) days after receipt of the evaluating agencies' report for each concuirency determinati n application identified in section 910.08(2), except for final concurrency determination applications. Each concurrency report will document: AUGUST 6, 2002 (a) The current land use and zoning designation, type and intensity of proposed use, and public facility availability upon which the reviews were based; (b) The specific facilities impacted by the proposed development; (c) The extent of theimpact on those facilities by the proposed development; and 93 n , l: ]_ '.7 i i7 • /3