9/3/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the September 3, 2002 Public Hearing. Revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded to Chairman of the Board for signature The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are available for viewing in the Board of County Commissioner's office ATTACHMENTS 1) Confirming Resolution 2) Assessment Roll and Cost Estimate 3) Assessment Map 4) Copy of typical letter sent to property owners 5) Copy of Publication Mr Kafer commented that the project had been reduced in cost and advised that staff had met with the homeowners the previous Thursday night. At that time, staff had received a petition from some people who were in opposition. (COPY ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) Staff had tallied the number of opposed and the number in favor and it was determined that 69% of the property owners were in favor of the project. Staff's recommendation was to move forward with the project. In response to Commissioner Adams, Public Works Director James Davis advised that this project will be paved with asphalt as opposed to the alternative paving method because of the nature of the subdivision. The Chairman opened the public hearing. and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Jerry Saturday, 1206 36th Avenue SW, advised that she represented petitioners opposed to this paving and drainage improvement. Those who petitioned originally for the project were mistakenly told the County would pay for it and she, therefore, thought the original petition was invalid. Many of the homeowners cannot afford an assessment which September 3, 2002 88 r!!