Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />In response to Commissioner Macht's inquiry concerning Mr Lewis' property, <br />Director Davis stated that Mr. Lewis' property does have frontage on 35`" Avenue SW, but <br />staff cannot speculate on when or how it will be developed. It if it is developed <br />commercially, it cannot have a connection to 35' Avenue SW. <br />Chairman Stanbridge was concerned about the discrepancy on the number of <br />petitioners. <br />Commissioner Adams commented that folks in this area have been before the <br />Commission twice and the Commissioners have people who are for and against. She stated <br />that the number of people in favor far outnumbered those opposed and those folks need <br />some relief. <br />Mr. Cafer commented that there seemed to be an equal representation of pros and <br />cons at the Thursday night meeting. The original petition had 67% in favor. <br />(CLERK'S NOTE* SEVERAL LETTERS AND/OR NOTES WERE SUBMITTED TO <br />THE DEPUTY CLERK AND HAVE BEEN PLACED ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP <br />IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ) <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the <br />assessment roll with the removal of the property owners on 33`d <br />Avenue SW and the commercially -zoned property (of Mr. <br />Lewis) and adopted Resolution No. 2002-062 confirming the <br />September 3, 2002 <br />91 <br />• <br />R. <br />