My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/3/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
9/3/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:11:28 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:46:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
09/03/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2561
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Management Funding <br />The Lost Tree Islands property contains approxim:..cI235 acres of uplands impacted by nuisance exotic <br />vegetation (Brazilian pepper and Australian pine). In accordance with FCT grant award conditions, the <br />impacted uplands will need to be restored (albeit over an extended period of time) to native plant <br />community. The approved FCT grant project also calls for passive recreational improvements (docks, <br />boardwalks, fishing piers, picnic pavilions and trails) on portions of the property. Although grants, <br />volunteer work, and private development mitigation directed toward the project will be sought to defray <br />costs, restoration and management of the Lost Tree Islands could cost in excess of Si million, largely <br />attributed to habitat restoration. Prior to FCT funding reimbursement, it is required that a conceptual <br />management plan for the project be approved by the County, City and Town. That management plan will <br />be drafted (by the County's acquisition consultants, in coordination with county staff and with the City <br />and Town) once LTVC accepts an offer and the acquisition is imminent. In the meantime, there needs to <br />be a conceptual agreement between the County, City and Town concerning responsibility for restoration <br />and management costs. Alternatives include: <br />1. Restoration and management costs split evenly among the three local governments. <br />2. Restoration and management costs split based on the current local funding ratio of 80/10/10. <br />3. Restoration and management costs paid entirely by the County. <br />From an administrative standpoint, it is efficient for one entity (i.e., the County) to take the lead in <br />overseeing construction of initial capital improvements and ongoing maintenance. In that the project is <br />located in the City and Town and directly benefits residents in the municipalities, it is reasonable to <br />expect the City and Town to contribute toward improvements and management costs. Of the three <br />alternatives, staff thinks it is appropriate to request that the City and Town evenly split capital <br />improvement and management costs with the County. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approved the proposed purchase contract. <br />Staff also recommends that the Board approve the attached Interlocal Agreement, with the following three <br />conditions: <br />1. Shortfall split evenly among the three local governments ($41,667 each). <br />2. Title interest (undivided) split based on current local funding ratio of 80/10/10 (County 80% <br />interest, City 10% interest, Town 10% interest). <br />3. Restoration and management costs split evenly among the three local governments. <br />Moreover, staff recommends that the Board authorize county staff to coordinate with the City and Town <br />to obtain City and Town approval of the Interlocal Agreement. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. Map of the Lost Tree Islands acquisition proposal <br />2. Proposed Contract Offer <br />3. Draft Interlocal Agreement <br />September 3, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.