My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/3/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
9/3/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:11:28 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:46:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
09/03/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2561
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stormwater Manaczement <br />All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require <br />on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations In <br />addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stosmv, ater <br />Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian <br />River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited <br />from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the <br />approved IRFWCD discharge rate. <br />In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do apply, since the property <br />lies within a floodplain. Also, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply Based <br />upon staff's analysis, the stormwater management level of service standard would be met by <br />limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty- <br />four hours, and requiring retention of 394 459 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the <br />property. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development <br />approval process. <br />Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the <br />most intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district <br />indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the <br />additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the <br />existing surplus acreage. <br />Park Information <br />LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) <br />Project Demand (Acres) <br />Surplus Acreage <br />Concurrency Summary <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, <br />including stormwater management, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have <br />adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the <br />proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject <br />request. <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive <br />plan. Rezomngs must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on <br />the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and <br />commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. <br />Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to <br />September 3, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.