My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/4/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
9/4/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 9:48:25 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:26:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
09/04/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2545
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ILI <br /> 1 <br /> ""My, <br /> +. �' r» p `r g� :�.i ,- <.rv; e'u a -kx , a '� =• r n u s.+", �.e�`-�^" -A't' "("r ""4m��`§` <br /> < . ., s> . . . ., . ,' , ' . ' . <br /> RECOMMENDATION : <br /> Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners : <br /> 1 . Make a finding that Planning and Zoning Commission ' s decision did not fail in any <br /> of the areas outlined in LDR section 902 . 07 , and <br /> 2 . Deny the appeal and uphold Planning and Zoning Commission ' s decision to uphold <br /> staffs decision to deny approval to construct a 6 ' tall fence within the subject site ' s <br /> front yard. <br /> ATTACHMENTS : <br /> 1 . Location Map <br /> 2 . Site Graphic and Application <br /> 3 . LDR Section 917 . 06( 12) : Walls and Fences <br /> 4 . Staff Denial Letter <br /> 5 . Letter Appealing Staff Denial <br /> 6 . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes and Action Letter <br /> 7 . Letter Appealing Planning and Zoning Commission Denial <br /> Director Boling responded to questions of Commissioner Macht regarding possible <br /> private deed restrictions and use of transparent fencing taller than the 4 feet allowed . Other <br /> clarifications were addressed as well as the stop sign in front of Ms . Carlton ' s house . <br /> Vicky Carlton advised , concerning the stop sign , that it is not generally observed <br /> because there is no traffic coming from the opposite direction . Speaking to Director Boling ' s <br /> memorandum , she advised that a very expensive (permitted) shooting range had just been put <br /> in on the property behind her so she did not foresee the sale and subdivision of that property <br /> very soon . In addressing the concern for safety vehicles not being able to see addresses , she <br /> advised there were no nearby houses . She stated she would be willing to stipulate that <br /> should a future subdivision be permitted, she would move the fence back to 25 feet from the <br /> property line . Her understanding was that she was looking for an exception to the rule . The <br /> house on Lot 7 has a fence 10 feet from the property line . She could not understand why she <br /> could not have the same thing, but was told , after the second denial , that the fence on Lot 7 <br /> September 4 , 2001 <br /> 54 <br /> Q PG 0 <br /> r <br /> fs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.