My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/01/2013 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
10/01/2013 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2018 4:20:35 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:34:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/01/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
144, 383-421
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Director Keating did not think staff would be successful in trying to get the southern <br />portion of the County Administration Campus (which is currently zoned as Medium and High <br />Density Multiple -Family Residential District) rezoned to government use, especially since there <br />has been neighborhood opposition. <br />No Board action required or taken. <br />12.A.2. CONSIDERATION OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL <br />PROTECTION'S PROPOSED SURPLUS AND SALE OF THREE CONSERVATION <br />LAND PARCELS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER PRESERVE <br />STATE PARK <br />Environmental Planning and Code Enforcement Chief Roland DeBlois provided <br />background, conditions, and analysis on the consideration of the Florida Department of <br />Environmental Protection's (FDEP) proposed surplus of statewide properties, as well as three <br />conservation land parcels - DRP -30, DRP -49, and DRP -50, associated with St. Sebastian River <br />Preserve State Park. He outlined the alternatives regarding the three proposed surplus sites, and <br />suggested the Board recommend to FDEP that only the southern pasture portion of DRP -30 <br />(south of the Trans -Florida Central Railway corridor) remain on the preliminary surplus lands <br />list, and that the remainder of DRP -30, all of DRP -49, and all of DRP -50 be taken off. <br />Commissioner Zorc proposed that future land swaps with the State include a reversion <br />clause so the property that is determined to be surplus will come back to the County. <br />Discussion ensued regarding properties that are taken off the list by the State, and the <br />process used when properties are offered back to the local government. <br />Ruth Stanbridge, 4835 66th Avenue, County Historian, provided background on the <br />parcels, and did not support the County taking them out of conservation. She wanted the Board <br />BK 144 PG 413 <br />October 1, 2013 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.