Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Director Stan Boling, through a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file), <br />provided background and a zoning map of the subject site. He reported that the surrounding area <br />is zoned Residential Multiple Family Unit up to 10 units an acre (RM -10), except for one <br />business (Stew Que), which has been historically zoned Limited Commercial (CL) He related <br />that all the evidence shows that the subject site has not been used in over one year, the <br />grandfathering is gone, and the use of the site for commercial is at a dead end. Director Boling <br />added that aside from the structure itself, there are site -related nonconformities, and Mr. Smith <br />has asked staff to waive the nonconformity Land Development Regulations (LDRs). Director <br />Boling recommended that no changes be made to the nonconformity LDRs, and affirmed that <br />any redevelopment of the structure would have to fall under the RM -10 zoning. <br />Vice Chairman Davis believed that the subject property was too damaged to be brought <br />back up to code. <br />Mr. Smith stressed that he would have no problem making the repairs, but he has been <br />unable to proceed because the building has lost its commercial zoning. He urged the Board to <br />give him the opportunity to make the improvements. <br />Chairman Flescher reminded Mr Smith that he had already been given additional time to <br />see what avenues he could explore. He believed that the structure was more severely damaged <br />than Mr Smith has assessed. <br />Building Official Jose Guanch described the extent of the detenoration, revealing that <br />staff is concerned about the structural integrity of the entire building. He emphasized that it <br />would take a lot of work to get the building back on track. <br />Commissioner Solari pointed out that the building has lost its grandfather clause because <br />it was abandoned for a long time; thus, that is no longer the issue. He declared that the problem <br />is that the type of land use proposed by Mr Smith is not permitted in the RM -10 zoning. <br />January 15, 2013 <br />9 <br />143 P6 3'8 <br />