Laserfiche WebLink
jeopardizing the A1A/17th Street project ("The Project"). Attorney Polackwich noted that there <br />would be a public hearing on February 21, 2012 for adoption of the final Ordinance. <br />After a brief discussion, it was clarified that in cases where the refund money is <br />unclaimed or rejected, it would be allocated back into the Fund 101 account. <br />Administrator Baird noted that any funds going back into the coffers would be utilized <br />for The Project. He cautioned that if all the funds are returned, another project would have to be <br />eliminated in order to afford the intersection improvements <br />Vice Chairman O'Bryan warned property owners who might be due a refund to be wary <br />of telephone solicitations for assistance with the refunds. <br />Commissioner Solari wanted to see the impact fees returned with interest until the entire <br />amount of Fund 101 is expended, or everyone who paid an impact fee has been contacted. He <br />noted that the impact fee law stipulates a refund of unexpended fees after six years and must be <br />upheld regardless of the need for The Project. <br />Pilar Turner, 1600 Indian Bay speaking as a resident and not a City of Vero Beach <br />Council Member, opined that the County was rushing to do The Project in order to avoid giving <br />the impact fee refunds. She urged the Board to return all the Fund 101 revenues to the property <br />owners, and to allow individuals 120 days from their notification of eligibility to apply for the <br />refund. <br />Commissioner Davis emphasized that impact fee law provides for the refund, and since <br />the County did not spend the dollars in Fund 101 in the time stipulated, there is only one correct <br />course of action, regardless of whether the money is needed. <br />January 17, 2012 10 <br />OK 141PG894 <br />