01/18/2011 (3) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

and less problematic to remove the deed restrictions at this time , to maximize use of the facility and augment appropriate sporting venues without said constraints . Discussion ensued, wherein several Commissioners expressed concerns that removing the deed restrictions might endanger the County ' s current parking rights on the Parking Property or allow an undesirable venue to be situated there ; about the difficulty of future removal of deed restrictions from encumbered property; and about the possibility of the City putting in a competing use to the developer DT Commons , Inc . , who is a party to the collateral agreement. Attorney Polackwich did not recommend such action. Further, he advised that the deed on the approximately 11 . 93 acre parcel that the City is conveying to the County, may not require the signature of DT Commons ; thus , allowing the County to control the question of removing the restrictions on its own parcel of property . Commissioner Davis recapped some discussions which had ensued at the Joint Meeting, during which the City had seemed receptive to the removal of the deed restrictions . He reiterated that removing the deed restrictions from the property would make it easier to augment desirable sporting venues , and that it would be harder to remove the restrictions later . MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis to remove the deed restrictions from the approximately 10 . 38 acre parcel west of the Vero Beach Sports Village (f/k/a Dodgertown) , known as the "Parking Property" and being deeded to the City of Vero Beach. Motion DIED for lack of a second . 14.D. COMMISSIONER JOSEPH E. FLESCHER NONE 27 January 18 , 2011