My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/21/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/21/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 3:55:21 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/21/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
30
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bittle and Stoddard, LLC, for an additional amount of <br />$18,741.88, for a new total contract amount of <br />$78,241.88, as recommended in the memorandum of <br />January 6, 2014. <br />DOCUMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />12..!.2. COST RECOVERY OPTIONS ON THE 66TH AVENUE WATER MAIN PROJECT <br />FROM 8TH STREET TO 16TH STREET - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT <br />No: UCP 4040 <br />Director Burke provided background, description, and analysis on the 66th Avenue Water <br />Main Project, which will enable certain property owners outside of the Urban Service Area <br />(USA) on 66th Avenue to connect to the County's water line if they wish. He noted that as part <br />of the project, the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) chose to <br />extend the piping across the relief canal for a looped system that would benefit the Utilities <br />Department. He explained that this project is unique because the property owners will not be <br />assessed 100% for the project costs; connection is voluntary, and it will be hard to recoup costs, <br />due to the low density of rate payers who will be tying into the system. After providing an <br />analysis of five scenarios for recouping project costs, Director Burke recommended that the <br />Board select Scenario No. 2, a 70/30 split with the property owners from 8t11 Street to 16th Street, <br />who connect to the water line, paying 70% of the project costs ($13, 637.29 per parcel minus <br />impact and connection fees), and the County paying the remaining 30%. <br />The Board questioned Director Burke on the scenarios he had presented, and asked why <br />the IRCDUS decided to loop the water system across the relief canal. Deliberations ensued on <br />the best way to recoup the County's costs while dividing them fairly among the property owners <br />who tap into the line. <br />January 21, 2014 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.