My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/21/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/21/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 3:55:00 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
239
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Table 11-4 <br />Current Level -of -Service <br />(1) Appendix A, Table A-1 for weighted seasonal population an dTable A-8 for functional population <br />2) Source: Table 11-1 <br />3) Number of beds (Item 2) divided by the population (Item41), multipled by 1,000 <br />4) Source: Indian River County; LOS standard for functional resident iss calculated based on the ratio <br />NTS <br />of actual LOS in terms of weighted population us functional population <br />Table 11-3 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian ..River County, and counties with <br />correctional facility impact fees throughout the State:of;F orida. The LOSis displayed in <br />terms of permanent population for`201'2,for all entities;because functional population data <br />analysis has not been completed for these entities, as was for Indian River County. In <br />addition, the number of beds for all jurisdictions presented m;the following table is based <br />�,.. <br />on gross beds. As presentedµ Indian River Countys LOS Is within the range of these <br />counties. <br />It is importaann, t <br />requires <br />to note thatsthe construction of correctional facilities tend to be "lumpy" and <br />significants investments for large, scales of construction. Indian River County <br />completed its most recent expansion in 2008; which was funded primarily with sales tax <br />revenues and currently doesnot have any plans to build additional jails. In addition, the <br />average daily. occupancy of- approximately 450 inmates represents 75 percent of the <br />available functional capacity. As mentioned previously, correctional impact fees are not <br />4 <br />being collected in Indian River County at this time, and there appears to be sufficient <br />capacity available to accommodate additional inmates due to growth in the near future. <br />This will be addressed further in the Affordable Growth section of the report. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 <br />14 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Population(1) <br />Component <br />Year2013 <br />Weighted <br />_Population <br />Functional <br />Population <br />148,001 <br />140,186 <br />Number of Beds(2) <br />612 <br />612 <br />LOS (beds per 1,000 residents)13l <br />, 4.14 <br />4.37 <br />Adopted <br />LOS Standard (beds <br />per 1,000 residents)l4l <br />4.50 <br />4.75 <br />(1) Appendix A, Table A-1 for weighted seasonal population an dTable A-8 for functional population <br />2) Source: Table 11-1 <br />3) Number of beds (Item 2) divided by the population (Item41), multipled by 1,000 <br />4) Source: Indian River County; LOS standard for functional resident iss calculated based on the ratio <br />NTS <br />of actual LOS in terms of weighted population us functional population <br />Table 11-3 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian ..River County, and counties with <br />correctional facility impact fees throughout the State:of;F orida. The LOSis displayed in <br />terms of permanent population for`201'2,for all entities;because functional population data <br />analysis has not been completed for these entities, as was for Indian River County. In <br />addition, the number of beds for all jurisdictions presented m;the following table is based <br />�,.. <br />on gross beds. As presentedµ Indian River Countys LOS Is within the range of these <br />counties. <br />It is importaann, t <br />requires <br />to note thatsthe construction of correctional facilities tend to be "lumpy" and <br />significants investments for large, scales of construction. Indian River County <br />completed its most recent expansion in 2008; which was funded primarily with sales tax <br />revenues and currently doesnot have any plans to build additional jails. In addition, the <br />average daily. occupancy of- approximately 450 inmates represents 75 percent of the <br />available functional capacity. As mentioned previously, correctional impact fees are not <br />4 <br />being collected in Indian River County at this time, and there appears to be sufficient <br />capacity available to accommodate additional inmates due to growth in the near future. <br />This will be addressed further in the Affordable Growth section of the report. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 <br />14 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.