Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Table V-4 <br />Level -of -Service (2013 <br />(1) Source: Table V-1 for buldings, Table V-2 for materials, anw&Tahle V 3 for computers and equipment <br />(2) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 <br />(3) Square footage/count (Item 1) divided by population: Item 2) multiplietby 1,000 <br />(4) Source: Indian River County a <br />(5) Source: Table V-3; only computers and equipment'available for public use are included <br />As presented in the table, the County's current4L®S is abovethe adopted L standard for <br />all elements, except for other library equipment. For impact fee calculations, the adopted <br />LOS standard is used in order to ensure newAdevelopment;:is not overcharged. In addition, a <br />ten,. <br />review of the CIP indicated that there -are no capital expansionmprojects programmed for the <br />next five years. As such the existing L is likely todecreasesomewhat, which suggests <br />that it is preferable to use the adopted LOSstandard;toprovide a more conservative <br />approach. <br />A comparisonokh'e current4lndian River -County L®.S, the adopted LOS standard, LOS of the <br />efs_.. <br />other::Florida counties, and the suggested State) standards is presented in Table V-5. The <br />via <br />comparison includes counties with a population of 100,000 to 750,000, and is based on the <br />information obtained from the Library Directory with Statistics, published by the <br />*r` <br />Department of State, Divisionof Library and Information Services It should be noted thatthe current LOS figures included in the table for Indian River County represent figures <br />provided by the Division of.t Library and Information Services and reflect FY 2013 data with <br />the use of permanent population. To be able to provide an "apples -to -apples" comparison, <br />2013 data is used for Indian River County and its peer group. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. <br />January 2014 <br />Indian River County <br />50 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Item <br />Sq.ii <br />Fo tae <br />g / <br />Count(l) <br />— — <br />110,237 <br />,ZI i; <br />Population <br />jl <br />148,001 <br />(per <br />LOS (p <br />1,000 0 <br />Residents)(3� ; <br />L - <br />Adopted LOS <br />Standard (per <br />1,000 <br />Residents) (4) <br />Library Buildings <br />(sf) <br />745 <br />580 <br />Library Materials (items) <br />584,519 <br />148,001 <br />3,949 <br />3,200 <br />Computers(5) <br />121 <br />148,001`- <br />0.8 <br />0.7 <br />Other Library Equipment <br />(items)(5) <br />33148;® <br />1 <br />0.2 <br />0.2 <br />(1) Source: Table V-1 for buldings, Table V-2 for materials, anw&Tahle V 3 for computers and equipment <br />(2) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 <br />(3) Square footage/count (Item 1) divided by population: Item 2) multiplietby 1,000 <br />(4) Source: Indian River County a <br />(5) Source: Table V-3; only computers and equipment'available for public use are included <br />As presented in the table, the County's current4L®S is abovethe adopted L standard for <br />all elements, except for other library equipment. For impact fee calculations, the adopted <br />LOS standard is used in order to ensure newAdevelopment;:is not overcharged. In addition, a <br />ten,. <br />review of the CIP indicated that there -are no capital expansionmprojects programmed for the <br />next five years. As such the existing L is likely todecreasesomewhat, which suggests <br />that it is preferable to use the adopted LOSstandard;toprovide a more conservative <br />approach. <br />A comparisonokh'e current4lndian River -County L®.S, the adopted LOS standard, LOS of the <br />efs_.. <br />other::Florida counties, and the suggested State) standards is presented in Table V-5. The <br />via <br />comparison includes counties with a population of 100,000 to 750,000, and is based on the <br />information obtained from the Library Directory with Statistics, published by the <br />*r` <br />Department of State, Divisionof Library and Information Services It should be noted thatthe current LOS figures included in the table for Indian River County represent figures <br />provided by the Division of.t Library and Information Services and reflect FY 2013 data with <br />the use of permanent population. To be able to provide an "apples -to -apples" comparison, <br />2013 data is used for Indian River County and its peer group. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. <br />January 2014 <br />Indian River County <br />50 Impact Fee Update Study <br />