My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2010 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2010
>
11/16/2010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2017 4:25:34 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:59:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2010
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4043
Book and Page
140, 153-208
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(2) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy (C.O.), <br />all required landscape buffers and opaque features shall be <br />installed; <br />(3) Residents of the worker housing dormitory building <br />shall be restricted to workers performing duties at the on- <br />site commercial stable facility and limited to a maximum <br />of 12 residents, all as stated and recommended in the <br />memorandum of November 1, 2010. <br />10.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />1O.B.1. REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM ROBERT T. WOOD REGARDING LANDLORDS <br />AND RENTERS <br />Robert Todd Wood, 1691 4th Court, Rockridge Subdivision, addressed the Board about <br />a situation occurring at 1671 4th Court, where a rental property has been leased to drug <br />users/dealers. He stated that he has already spoken to the landlord, and noted that the Sheriff and <br />Emergency Services have made over 30 trips to the subject property. Mr. Wood felt the situation <br />was a drain on tax dollars, unsafe, and unhealthy and asked the Board if there was any remedy <br />relative to Section 973.04 of Chapter 973, the Public Nuisance Code. <br />Vice Chairman Wheeler revealed that if a landlord knowingly allows illegal activity on <br />his or her property, the property is subject to confiscation. He advised Mr. Wood to pursue this <br />matter with the Sheriff. <br />County Attorney Alan Polackwich, Sr., agreed that if the property is being used for <br />illegal activity with the owner's knowledge, there may be a forfeiture possibility. He stated that <br />the nuisance ordinance does not deal with this issue and that there is no local remedy at this time; <br />thus a solution should be sought in the domain of criminal law. <br />25 <br />November 16, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.