My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/2012
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
12/11/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2016 1:22:10 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:20:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/2012
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4056
Book and Page
143, 242-278
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I ZL PUBLIC WORKS <br /> 12.1. 1 PROFESSIONAL COASTAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, <br /> REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2012050 <br /> Director of Public Works Chris Mora reported that the County' s contracts with Coastal <br /> Technology Corporation and Applied Technology & Management, Inc. are nearing expiration, <br /> and the County needs to begin negotiating for the provision of coastal engineering and coastal <br /> environmental services . He stated that a selection committee was convened to evaluate 18 <br /> engineering firms that responded to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) that was issued in <br /> August 2012 , and displayed a chart depicting the point scores and rankings of each firm. He <br /> thereafter presented staff s recommendation to begin negotiations with the top ranked firm for <br /> Part 1 . Coastal Engineering Services : Coastal Planning Engineering, Inc. ; and for Part 2 . Coastal <br /> Environmental Services : Ecological Associates, Inc. <br /> Vice Chairman Davis believed that not including Coastal Technology on the selection <br /> committee' s shortlist was a drawback, because the County would not be able to draw upon their <br /> knowledge of the completed beach restoration projects . He also believed it would be more cost <br /> effective to use a company that is already familiar with the projects . <br /> Coastal Engineer James Gray, with input from Director Mora, spoke to Vice Chairman <br /> Davis ' s concerns. He advised that it is not uncommon to change engineers, and there would be <br /> no lapse relative to the beach projects . He also disclosed that Coastal Technology is still <br /> working for the County through completion of Work Order 13 on an extended contract. <br /> Attorney Polackwich related the circumstances under which the County would still have <br /> some access to Coastal Technology. <br /> Commissioner Zorc mentioned that Coastal Technology has provided valuable assistance <br /> with the permitting process for the upland sand used in the Sector 3 Beach Restoration Project; <br /> ` 4 143 rb 269 <br /> December 11 , 2012 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.