Laserfiche WebLink
County agreements ; negotiated terms; wage and capital investment objectives ; employment <br /> levels ; and the new performance objectives . He believed the proposed agreement is fair to both <br /> the community and Piper, and thereafter responded to questions from the Board. <br /> Frank Harkins, Piper Aircraft, Inc. Vice President and General Counsel, invited <br /> questions, there were none. <br /> MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner O ' Bryan, <br /> SECONDED by Vice Chairman Davis, to approve and <br /> authorize the Chairman to execute the proposed County <br /> Amendment Agreement with Piper Aircraft, Inc. <br /> Commissioner Solari did not support the Motion. He believed that Piper is great for the <br /> community, but voiced concern that they did not provide him with requested financial <br /> information. He said he had also asked them that in lieu of the requested information, the $2 <br /> million (half of the $4 million Piper received from the County in 2008) be secured, and was <br /> informed it would not be possible. <br /> Chairman Flescher stated that he had also requested financial information and received <br /> none, and recently asked for employment numbers, which was delayed. He believed the <br /> Commissioners require this type of information in order to make an informed decision; therefore, <br /> he did not support the Motion. <br /> Administrator Baird thought Piper had been extremely cooperative throughout the <br /> process . He revealed that their numbers change constantly, that staff had received information <br /> showing the number of planes sold, levels of employment, and like most private companies, the <br /> company is reluctant to give out their financial information due to their competitors . <br /> December 18, 2012 31 <br /> IX <br /> :143 PG 323 <br /> i <br />