Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> Commissioner Davis agreed with dispensing the refunds ; however, he felt that an <br /> application-driven refund process would be fairer. <br /> MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner Solari, <br /> SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, to have the Fund <br /> 101 impact fee refund process be application-driven, with <br /> no application fees . <br /> Discussion ensued regarding whether it would be best to issue the refunds or proceed <br /> with the A 1 A Project . <br /> County Administrator Joseph Baird, with input from Public Works Director Christopher <br /> Mora, elaborated on the need for the AIA Project. <br /> Charlie Wilson, County resident, maintained that the AlA/ 17th Street intersection was <br /> not broken, and advocated giving the refunds to the fee payers . <br /> Commissioner Solari asserted that the County should do what is right for the individual <br /> fee payers . <br /> Commissioner Flescher spoke about the original impact fee payers who had reserved <br /> capacity but never built their projects, questioning why the County would want to reward them. <br /> He voiced support for moving ahead with the AIA Project. <br /> Annabel Robertson, Asset Research and Recovery, 3404 Aviation Boulevard, <br /> representing 130 homeowners in the old District II, declared that all the homeowners who paid <br /> into Fund 101 are owed a refund with interest. <br /> 1 141 PG 816 .4 <br /> December 20 , 2011 26 <br />