My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/01/2011 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
02/01/2011 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2016 10:40:27 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:02:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/01/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4047
Book and Page
140, 419-457
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IO. B* 29 REQUEST TO SPEAK FROMARDRA RIGBYAND GEORGE RIGBY <br /> REGARDING GRANTING OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENT - DELETE <br /> MAI REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM DR. STEPHEN Je FAHERTY SR. REGARDING <br /> PROPOSED BALLOT RESOLUTIONS <br /> Dr. Stephen Faherty, Sr . , 2120 Captain' s Walk, Vero Beach, spoke about the 30-year <br /> agreements that the County entered into in 1987 regarding the City of Vero Beach' s (the City) <br /> water, sewer and electric . He said the agreements would expire in 2017 , and may require a <br /> 5 -year advance notice by spring of 2012 . He read statements from the Electric Territorial <br /> Agreement approved in 1981 by the Public Service Commission (PSC) between Florida Power <br /> and Light (FPL) and the City, and pointed out that all utility customers need to be contacted to <br /> obtain their preference/views regarding the change in territory . Mr. Faherty suggested, in view <br /> of the upcoming November 2011 election, that the Board consider obtaining the required <br /> information for the PSC on whether they should : ( 1 ) stay with the City for electricity or switch <br /> to Florida Power and Light (FPL) ; or (2) stay with the City or switch to the County (for water <br /> service) by adding a ballot initiative , conducting an independent survey , or using a "bill stuffer" <br /> in the City ' s billing system . <br /> Discussion ensued between Mr . Faherty and the Board regarding the methods for <br /> obtaining information from the utility customers , the advantage of using a straw ballot, the <br /> consideration of a joint meeting between the City and County, there not being a County-wide <br /> ballot in 2011 , the "bill staffer" mailing method being the cheapest and best method, obtaining <br /> facts and figures to document public objection, and economic duplication in changing the service <br /> territory . <br /> Chairman Solari felt it would be best for the County Attorney to : ( 1 ) look at the cost of a <br /> ballot initiative ; (2) identify the pros and cons ; and (3 ) discuss the PSC case with Mr. Faherty . <br /> February 1 , 2011 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.