Laserfiche WebLink
drainage from both properties would be better, and could be conveyed north towards the 41 " <br /> Street ditch. He also mentioned that staff had examined options and proposals, but not property <br /> lines . <br /> Mr. Fair announced that the Property Owners ' Association did not want to pursue <br /> Director Mora' s option. <br /> Jacqui Shearer, 58603 91h Lane, voiced concerns over a citation she received . She said <br /> when she purchased her property, neither the bank nor the title company revealed that her <br /> property was creating a drainage issue, and that the County had signed off on the property 20 <br /> years ago . She did not believe it was proper to make her pay for the citation since the developer <br /> did not install the drainage ditch as proposed . <br /> Director Mora explained that staff had taken topographic surveys of all the properties that <br /> have a common boundary with Mr. Spruce , and superimposed the original perimeter ditch that <br /> was on Sylvan Lakes ' plans . He believes that if a shallow swale were to be dug at the rear of the <br /> properties , there would be enough fall to convey the water off the properties and send it north to <br /> their retention pond . He indicated that this was shown on the plans that were given to Mr . <br /> Morgan for the Sylvan Lakes Homeowners ' Association to review, as well as three possible <br /> solutions : ( 1 ) dig a shallow swale, (2) have a common swale that straddles the property lines , or <br /> (3 ) install a pipe within the ten-foot drainage easement . <br /> Further discussion ensued among the Commissioners and staff regarding proposed <br /> solutions, some of the ditch being located on private property, the run- off pooling on Mr . <br /> Spruce ' s property, and staff providing a copy of the topographic survey to Ms . Shearer . <br /> Ilse Knab , 3941 58th Circle, believed that if or when the swale is built, the water would <br /> run into the lake past her property . She is located adjacent to the common ground and utility <br /> easement, and when she moved in she was told that she was required to grade, install a sprinkler <br /> system, and sod it, which she did . She voiced concern because irrigation pipes would need to be <br /> IN # 42 PG 070 <br /> February 14, 2012 19 <br />