My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/13/2012 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
03/13/2012 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2022 9:00:15 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:13:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Date
03/13/2012
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4053
Book and Page
142, 165-209
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the title insurance companies to work with the County and homeowners to come up with a <br />permanent total solution. He added that the solution should encompass both the 20 -foot strip that <br />is subject to the tax deed, and the lot lines on 51St Avenue that are inconsistent with the actual <br />property boundaries of the homeowners. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Flescher, to authorize the <br />County Attorney's office and Community Development <br />to: (1) contact the affected parties, explain the problem, <br />and obtain copies of the title insurance policies; and (2) <br />contact the title insurance companies and urge them to <br />work together with the County and homeowners to come <br />up with a permanent total solution to the boundary dispute <br />involving both the 20 -foot strip subject to the tax deed, <br />and the lot lines that are inconsistent with the actual <br />property boundaries of the homeowners. <br />Vice Chairman O'Bryan wondered if resurveying the disputed parcel would be the first <br />step to a conflict resolution. <br />Discussion ensued, with input from Attorney Polackwich and County Surveyor David <br />Schryver, about the feasibility of having a new survey undertaken. <br />Mike Porter, 6465 51St Avenue, explained why he questioned the Brackett survey. <br />Commissioner Davis wanted to know how the County could recoup the cost of a survey. <br />Attorney Polackwich responded that the County could seek payment from the property <br />owners, or get the title companies to fund the solution. He stated that the solution will take some <br />March 13, 2012 29 <br />BK 142PG205 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.