03/22/2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Bittle responded to questioning from Attorney Poliakoff on his credentials ; Magnolia Lakes ; his earlier mention of an industrial area from 43 `d Avenue to 27`" Avenue being compatible with surrounding residential uses ; the height of Oslo Road and the proposed debris piles ; trip traffic calculations ; the types of trees used for the buffers ; whether Mr. Bittle wished to make any changes to his earlier testimony regarding the spotters ; and why the Applicant had not chosen to build its facility closer to the landfill . The Chairman called a break at 2 : 49 p. m. , and the meeting reconvened at 3 : 02 p. m. , with all members present. Mr. Dart provided for Attorney Segal , information on what the effects would be if concrete with lead paint inadvertently got processed at the facility. Mr. Bittle, responding to questioning from Attorney Segal about the areas adjacent to the Magnolia Lakes Subdivision, provided arguments supporting the suitability of the A- 1 Walee facility in the proposed location. Attorney Segal sought and received confirmation from Mr. Preuss that his analysis had not been based on the market value of any specific property proximate to the facility . Responding to further questioning from Attorney Segal on possible effects the facility might have on neighboring properties , Mr. Preuss stated that currently, the site houses an old metal building with no landscaping and the Applicant ' s buffer might dress up the region . PRESENTATION BY THE INTERVENOR Keith M. Poliakoff, P.A reported that the South County Preservation Society consists of 3 , 000 residents living near the proposed facility . Through a PowerPoint presentation (Composite Exhibit 1 ), he described past uses of the property and displayed a map showing the AG and residential uses surrounding the site . He recapped that the Applicant is looking for permission to March 22 , 2011 24