My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/08/2014 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
04/08/2014 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:46:35 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:44:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/08/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
36
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12.D. HUMAN RESOURCES - NONE <br />12.E. HUMAN SERVICES - NONE <br />12.F. LEISURE SERVICES - NONE <br />12. G. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET - NONE <br />12.H. RECREATION - NONE <br />12.I. PUBLIC WORKS <br />12.1.1 RESOLUTIONS FOR PAVING (MILLINGS) IMPROVEMENTS AND TO SET A <br />PUBLIC HEARING FOR 4TH PLACE PETITION MILLINGS PROJECT FROM 66TH <br />AVENUE TO ONE BLOCK EAST OF 63RD AVENUE IN THE PINE TREE PARK <br />SUBDIVISION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - IRC PROJECT NO.132 7 <br />Director of Public Works Chris Mora provided background on the petition millings <br />project proposed for 4th Place from 66th Avenue to one block east of 63rd Avenue advising that <br />75% of the subject property owners want the road segment paved. He disclosed that the <br />estimated project cost is $109,170.96, with the property owners paying 75% or $81,878.22 and <br />the County paying 25% or $27,292.74. Director Mora requested that the Board approve: (1) the <br />proposed Resolutions providing for the millings installation and setting the public hearing for <br />May 20, 2014 at 9:05 a.m., and (2) the allocation of $27,292.74 from the Road and Bridge <br />Petition Paving account. <br />Chairman O'Bryan relayed that the Commissioners had received an email from a resident <br />who was opposed to the project because the full cost of each assessment was not provided when <br />the petitions were circulated. <br />April 8, 2014 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.