My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/07/2013
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
05/07/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2018 11:59:56 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/07/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
143, 770-818
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approved and authorized the Chairman to execute <br />Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 1 as presented, in <br />the amount of $5,617.50; (2) found that the project is <br />needed to accommodate new growth in the County; (3) <br />and found that new growth will proportionately benefit <br />from the project, as recommended in the memorandum of <br />April 17, 2013. <br />AMENDMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />12.J.2. APPROVAL OF BID AWARD FOR IRC BID No. 2013028 UTILITIES RO <br />PLANTS LIME SL URRYINJECTION <br />Director of Utility Services Vincent Burke recapped the memorandum of April 29, 2013 <br />to provide background on this item, which pertains to the bid award for construction of a lime <br />slurry injection treatment system for the County's south and north reverse osmosis water <br />treatment plants. He advised that Summit Construction of Vero Beach, LLC, who had submitted <br />the lowest bid, had asked that the County withdraw their bid due to a substantial calculation <br />error. However, due to the Easter holiday and a misunderstanding about the County's holiday <br />schedule, Summit's withdrawal was not received wrtlun two business days of the bid opening as <br />required. <br />Administrator Baird noted that although staff has no problem going to the second lowest <br />bidder, they did not have the authority to authorize Summit's bid withdrawal under the <br />requirements set forth in the bid documents and County code. <br />Chairman Flescher acknowledged that there was confusion over the holiday closures, and <br />felt that it was clearly Summit's intention was to rectify the situation immediately. <br />• <br />May 7, 2013 21 <br />143 PG 804 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.