Laserfiche WebLink
A broad -ranging discussion ensued, with individual Board members suggesting the <br />following: <br />• Explore whether homeowners in the state of California (which has a pool heater <br />ordinance), have brought their sound levels into compliance after construction of <br />a barrier wall <br />• Explore the sound levels of modern, efficient, pool heaters and air conditioning <br />units, so a determination can be made on what changes to the code might be <br />desired <br />Mrs. Kelly in response to Commissioner O'Bryan's query, agreed to drop her Code <br />Enforcement Board complaints if the Fammms build the sound barrier. <br />Mr. Fannin reiterated his concerns that they would still have a Code Enforcement Board <br />violation if the wall is built, but the dB level of the pool heater does not decrease to 60. <br />Roland DeBlois, Environmental Planner and Code Enforcement Chief, acknowledged <br />that the Code Board makes the final decision in the end, but surmised that if the sound level <br />measures within a dB or two a resolution can be reached. Director Keating added that the Code <br />Enforcement Board will not be measuring the sound levels unless there is a complaint. <br />Mr. Fannin requested that Mrs Kelly indicate m writing her agreement to drop the Code <br />Enforcement Board complaint if they construct the barrier around their pool heater. <br />Chief DeBlois advised Mr. Fannin that the July 2, 2013 meeting minutes would serve his <br />purpose. <br />No Board Action Required or Taken <br />July 2, 2013 14 <br />44 PG 027 <br />