My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/16/2011 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
08/16/2011 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2016 12:03:19 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:07:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/16/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4050
Book and Page
141, 203-276
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Building Permit or initial One -Year Concurrency Certificate as having been revoked, withdrawn, <br /> or expired . He stated that he would include interpretations of "non-commencement" in an <br /> upcoming presentation addressing impact fees of a legal nature . <br /> Charlie Wilson, 1057 6th Avenue, although he disagreed with their definition of "non- <br /> commencement, " supported staff' s recommendation regarding the cost of the impact fee refund <br /> applications and the timing of the payment. He reported on the system that ARR has developed <br /> to track and notify potential eligible persons, and offered ARR' s assistance with the tracking and <br /> notification process . <br /> Commissioner Davis disclosed that he might be purchasing from Mr. Wilson some data <br /> pertaining to open permits, and would abstain from voting . <br /> ON MOTION by Commissioner O ' Bryan, SECONDED <br /> by Commissioner Flescher, in association with impact fee <br /> refund applications associated with building permits or <br /> concurrency certificates that have been issued for a project <br /> and been revoked, expired, or withdrawn (also referred to <br /> as Non - Commencement) , the Board, by a 4-0 vote <br /> (Commissioner Davis recused himself) : ( 1 ) approved to <br /> deduct the impact fee refund application fee from the <br /> gross amount of the refund due to the fee payer ; and (2) <br /> approved Resolution 2011 -060 , revising fees for <br /> processing impact fee refund applications . <br /> Discussion ensued about the importance of the County having a notification system on <br /> refund eligibility, so persons eligible for a refund do not have to track down their own refund . <br /> August 16 , 2011 38 BA 141 PG 259 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.