Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion and debate ensued as individual Board members opined on the best way to <br /> restructure the County Commission office, and whether it would be best to designate one of the <br /> Commissioner Assistants, or the County Administrator, as the overall supervisor. <br /> Attorney Polackwich explained that current County Code would need to be amended . He <br /> also pointed out that the key question is who will become the supervisor of the Commissioner <br /> Assistants . <br /> Commissioners Wheeler, O ' Bryan, and Solari supported having the County <br /> Administrator or his designee oversee administrative staff; whereas, Commissioner Davis <br /> preferred to structure operations within the Commission office . <br /> Commissioner Flescher wanted to see a broader scale of reorganization for the County <br /> Commission office, and suggested having additional meetings on this matter. <br /> The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 3 -2 <br /> vote (Commissioners Davis and Flescher opposed) , the <br /> Motion carried. The Board approved to reorganize the <br /> Board of County Commission administrative staff into a <br /> pooled format, and to place that staff under the overall <br /> supervision of the County Administrator or his designee, <br /> as requested in the memorandum of September 4, 2012 . <br /> Attorney Polackwich stated that along with changes in the employment policy that do not <br /> require approval, staff would be drafting an ordinance amending Sections 100 . 02 (4) , 101 . 05 , and <br /> 101 . 08 of County Code, to effect the changes discussed today; he would return with the <br /> proposed ordinance for Board approval . <br /> - 14 2 MPG 8 <br /> September 11 , 2012 24 <br />