Laserfiche WebLink
s, a <br /> >. <br /> Oslo Road Improvement Project Page 3 <br /> File No . 11 -5420 <br /> 2 . 2 Field Permeability Tests <br /> Six field permeability tests were performed in the general vicinity of the proposed dry detention <br /> pond areas . The field permeability tests were performed by installing a solid-walled PVC casing <br /> snugly fit into a 3- inch diameter 5400t deep auger borehole . The bottom of the pipe was open and <br /> raised 1 foot above the bottom of the borehole . The bottom 1 foot of the borehole was gravel - <br /> ' packed . The pipe was then filled to the top with water. The tests were conducted as a "constant <br /> head" test by measuring the quantity of water added over a 20- minute time period to maintain the <br /> water level at the top of casing level . <br /> 2 . 3 Test Locations <br /> The locations of the auger borings and field permeability tests were determined in the field by <br /> estimating distances from existing site features as depicted on the "Oslo Road Improvements" <br /> sheets , which were prepared and provided by Indian River County. The station and offset of each <br /> boring and field permeability test presented on Figures 4 and 5 should be considered approximate <br /> and are in reference to the baseline of construction depicted on the provided roadway plan sheets. <br /> 2 . 4 Groundwater Measurements <br /> Where encountered , the groundwater level was measured in the boreholes after stabilization of <br /> the downhole water level . The measured groundwater levels are shown adjacent to the soil <br /> profiles on the Soil Boring Profiles sheets . As shown on Figures 4 and 5, groundwater was not <br /> encountered within the vertical reach of some of the borings on the date drilled . However, this <br /> does not necessarily mean that groundwater would not be encountered at these locations at some <br /> other time . Fluctuations in groundwater levels on this site should be anticipated throughout the <br /> year primarily due to seasonal variations in rainfall and other factors that may vary from the time <br /> the borings were conducted . Groundwater may also "perch" atop the shallow clayey soils during <br /> or immediately following periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall . <br /> 3 . 0 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM <br /> 3 . 1 Visual Examination and Classification Testing <br /> Our drillers observed the soil recovered from the auger, placed the recovered soil samples in <br /> moisture- proof containers , and maintained a log for each boring . The field soil boring logs and <br /> recovered soil samples were transported to our soils laboratory from the project site . Each soil <br /> sample was then visually classified by a geotechnical engineer in accordance with the American <br /> Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO ) Soil Classification System <br /> Y (ASTM D -3282) . <br /> In addition , particle size analysis (ASTM D422 ) , Atterberg limits (ASTM D -423/424) , moisture <br /> content (ASTM D -2216 ) and organic content (ASTM D-2974) tests were conducted on <br /> representative soil samples to aid in classification of the soils . The results of our tests are shown <br /> adjacent to the sample depth on the soil boring profiles presented on Figures 4 and 5 and are <br /> summarized on the Roadway Soil Survey sheet presented as Figure 6 . The resulting soil <br /> descriptions and the results of our tests are also summarized on Table 2 . Particle size analysis <br /> results are included in Appendix 111 . <br /> dC <br /> 4 <br /> 7777 <br /> d S i <br />