My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-246
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-246
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2016 10:58:14 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:47:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
09/16/2003
Control Number
2003-246
Agenda Item Number
11.J.1
Entity Name
St.Johns River Water Management District
Subject
Cost-Share Program County RO/ Concentrate Stormwater, reclaimed water
Citrus Best Management Practices
Project Number
SG469AA/N
Archived Roll/Disk#
3162
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3402
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l SJRWMD Alternative Water Supply Construction Cost -Sharing Application Form 2003-2004 <br /> EVALUATION FACTORS related to question 114 . <br /> a. Will water from this project directly and effectively take the place of an existing or proposed higher <br /> quality water source? b . Will the project be cost effective? 0-20 points . Based on rater 's assessment of <br /> the effectiveness of the project at saving potable water and apparent relative cost-effectiveness. <br /> Because of the great variation in types of projects, calculations of cost-effectiveness for widely <br /> dissimilar projects, such as urban reuse and agricultural freeze protection ponds, will not be directly <br /> compared <br /> Does the project contribute to recovery of violated minimum flows or levels? This will be determined for <br /> you by SJRWMD staff. 0- 10 points . Yes = 10; No = 0. <br /> 7. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as <br /> improving or protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge, or conserving <br /> water? Yes_X No <br /> If yes, then describe benefits . You may add a one-page attachment behind this page if necessary. <br /> Mixing R. Q . concentrate water with stormwater and reusing as reclaimed water will reduce <br /> concentrate and stormwater being released into the Indian River Lagoon. <br /> EVALUATION FACTOR related to question B4 : <br /> Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving <br /> or protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge, or conserving water? 0- 10 points . <br /> Based on rater 's assessment of the extent and significance of additional benefits. <br /> 8. Is the project being undertaken in response to enforcement actions taken against the applicant <br /> because of failure to comply with permit conditions or other regulations? Yes® No [:] <br /> If yes, identify the agency and regulatory program.F .D . E .P . - N.P .D .E . S . <br /> EVALUATION FACTOR related to question rB4 . <br /> Is the project necessary to comply with an enforcement action by a local, state, or federal agency? <br /> Enforcement action = 0; Otherwise = 10. <br /> 9. Is the applicant currently in violation of any local, state, or federal regulations ? <br /> Yes No <br /> If yes, provide explanation. <br /> A-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.