Laserfiche WebLink
or the results of subsequent inspections or tests , revise <br /> 2. ENGINEER's recommendation of any payment or revoke any such payment recommendation <br /> requested in an Application for Payment will constitute a previously made, to such extent as may be necessary in <br /> representation by ENGINEER to OWNER, based on ENGINEER's opinion to protect OWNER from loss <br /> ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the executed because: <br /> Work as an experienced and qualified design <br /> professional and on ENGINEER's review of the Appli- a. the Work is defective, or completed Work <br /> cation for Payment and the accompanying data and has been damaged , requiring correction or replace- <br /> schedules, that to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge, ment; <br /> information and belief: <br /> b. the Contract Price has been reduced by <br /> a . the Work has <br /> progressed to the point Written Amendment or Change Orders; <br /> indicated; <br /> c. OWNER has been required to correct <br /> b. the quality of the Work is generally in accor- defective Work or complete Work in accordance <br /> dance with the Contract Documents (subject to an with paragraph 13. 09; or <br /> evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior <br /> to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of d. ENGINEER has actual knowledge of the <br /> any subsequent tests called for in the Contract occurrence of any of the events enumerated in <br /> Documents, to a final determination of quantities paragraph 15.02.A. <br /> and classifications for Unit Price Work under <br /> paragraph 9.08, and to any other qualifications C. Payment Becomes Due <br /> stated in the recommendation ); and <br /> 1 . Ten days after presentation of the Application for <br /> c. the conditions precedent to Payment to OWNER with ENGINEER's recommenda- <br /> CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such payment tion, the amount recommended will (subject to the <br /> appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is provisions of paragraph 14.02. D) <br />become due, and <br /> ENGINEER's responsibility to observe the Work, when due will be paid by OWNER to CONTRACTOR. <br /> 3. By recommending any such payment ENGI- D. Reduction in Payment <br /> NEER will not thereby be deemed to have represented <br /> that: (i ) inspections made to check the quality or the 1 . OWNER may refuse to make payment of the full <br /> quantity of the Work as it has been performed have amount recommended by ENGINEER because: <br /> been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of the Work <br /> in progress , or involved detailed inspections of the Work a. claims have been made against OWNER on <br /> beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to account of CONTRACTOR's performance or fur- <br /> ENGINEER in the Contract Documents; or (ii ) that there nishing of the Work; <br /> may not be other matters or issues between the parties <br /> that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally b. Liens have been filed in connection with the <br /> by OWNER or entitle OWNER to withhold payment to Work, except where CONTRACTOR has delivered <br /> CONTRACTOR. a specific Bond satisfactory to OWNER to secure <br /> 4. Neither ENGINEER'S review of the satisfaction and discharge of such Liens ; <br /> CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of recom- c, there are other items entitling OWNER to a <br /> mending payments nor ENGINEER's recommendation set-off against the amount recommended ; or <br /> of any payment, including final payment, will impose <br /> responsibility on ENGINEER to supervise, direct, or d. OWNER has actual knowledge of the occur- <br /> control the Work or for the means, methods , rence of any of the events enumerated in para- <br /> techniques , sequences , or procedures of construction, graphs 14.02. B .5.a through 14 . 02. B. 5. c or para- <br /> or the safety precautions and programs incident thereto, graph 15.02.A. <br /> or for CONTRACTOR's failure to comply with Laws and <br /> Regulations applicable to CONTRACTOR's 2. If OWNER refuses to make payment of the full <br /> performance of the Work. Additionally, said review or amount recommended by ENGINEER, OWNER must <br /> recommendation will not impose responsibility on ENGI- give CONTRACTOR immediate written notice (with a <br /> NEER to make any examination to ascertain how or for copy to ENGINEER) stating the reasons for such action <br /> what purposes CONTRACTOR has used the moneys and promptly pay CONTRACTOR any amount <br /> paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine remaining after deduction of the amount so withheld. <br /> that title to any of the Work, materials , or equipment has OWNER shall promptly pay CONTRACTOR the amount <br /> passed to OWNER free and clear of any Liens. so withheld, or any adjustment thereto agreed to by <br /> OWNER and CONTRACTOR, when CONTRACTOR <br /> 5. ENGINEER may refuse to recommend the whole corrects to OWNER's satisfaction the reasons for such <br /> or any part of any payment if, in ENGINEER's opinion, it action. <br /> would be incorrect to make the representations to <br /> OWNER referred to in paragraph 14 . 02 . 13 .2. ENGI- 3. If it is subsequently determined that OWNER's <br /> NEER may also refuse to recommend any such pay- refusal of payment was not justified , the <br /> amount <br /> ment or, because of subsequently discovered evidence <br /> 00700 - 31 <br />