2007-299 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E. 1 I July 2007 Page 8 the desirability of continuing the SWDD practice of separate C&D debris disposal in a dedicated unlined C&D landfill in comparison with co-disposing it conuningled with MSW in a lined Class I landfill. Geosyntec performed this task by considering the economic and environmental issues, and prepared a technical report that summarized the results of the study with conclusions and recommendations for submittal to the SWDD Board. A copy of this report is included as Appendix A to this proposal. Therefore, Geosyntec has included a budget estimate for the preparation of this report, which includes attendance of two review meetings with SWDD. SCHEDULE Geosyntec estimates that the scope of work of this amendment would extend the project schedule by six months. A Substantial Modification Permit Application for the Class I — Segment 3 landfill lateral expansion will be prepared and submitted to FDEP during this period. BUDGET ESTIMATE A budget estimate for the scope of work outlined in Tasks 1 through 6 of this proposal is summarized in the following table. The budget estimate does not include FDEP permit application fees. A detailed budget estimate is provided as Attachment 2 . • Task I — General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management $233206 • Task 2 — Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Investigations S 19,339 • Task 3 — Design and Permit Application $993648 • Task 4 — ERP Modification $23 ,706 • Task 5 — Response to Regulatory Comments $ 18 , 892 • Task 6 — Feasibility study of Landfill Consolidation $ 18,692 TOTAL $2031483 The budget estimate presented in this proposal is based on Geosyntec's understanding of the project requirements and experience with permitting similar facilities. Geosyntec will not exceed the budget estimate without prior approval and written authorization from S WDD. X1_0609MAmendmem to Class 1 landfill Design Work Order.doc crib nears i scientists I innovators