My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-299
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2007
>
2007-299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2016 11:53:04 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 11:07:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Amendment
Approved Date
09/04/2007
Control Number
2007-299
Agenda Item Number
14.B.3
Entity Name
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
Subject
Amendment to Work Order No.4 Services Landfill Lateral Expansion
Area
County Landfill Fafility
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
6544
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geosyntec Consultants <br /> 5, LEACHATE FROM LAND DISPOSED RESIDENTIAL <br /> CONSTRUCTION WASTE <br /> Presently, the SWDD disposes C&D debris in unlined landfills . The leachate created <br /> from the interaction of C&D waste with rainfall or groundwater may contain trace <br /> amounts of hazardous chemicals. Sources of such chemicals include solvents and <br /> adhesives, as well as the primary construction material themselves. While the chemicals <br /> leaching from materials such as wood, drywall and concrete are not typically toxic, they <br /> can contribute to an overall degradation of groundwater quality. Simulated leachate <br /> from C&D debris containing drywalls was found to exceed the secondary maximum <br /> contaminant levels for drinking water for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and sulfate (3 ). <br /> Also, sulfides were formed from the conversion of sulfate by sulfate-reducing bacteria <br /> under the unsaturated and anaerobic conditions. <br /> In another study of the quality of C&D debris leachate, which included both laboratory <br /> and field tests, leachate generated from C&D debris was found to be turbid and black in <br /> color and contained a strong hydrogen sulfide odor (4). The source of sulfate was <br /> believed to be the dissolution of gypsum drywall (CaSO4 2H2O). Also, aluminum, iron, <br /> and manganese were detected in all of the leachate samples. Arsenic, chromium, <br /> copper, and lead were also routinely detected. The most likely source of arsenic , <br /> chromium, and copper was chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood. CCA- <br /> treated wood was a common construction component in Florida. Trace organic <br /> compounds may be found in paint thinners, stains, motor oils, plastics and paints, which <br /> are not uncommon, but occasionally observed in the construction waste stream. <br /> 6. COST COMPARISON OF C&D DEBRIS DISPOSAL IN AN UNLINED <br /> LANDFILL VS. CO-DISPOSAL IN A CLASS I LANDFILL <br /> The methodology of the cost comparison study of the two C&D debris landfill disposal <br /> alternatives includes the following steps: <br /> I . Estimate the landfill capacity of Cell 2 for commingled waste <br /> 2 . Estimate the cost of constructing Cell 2 as a Class I landfill <br /> 3 . Estimate the Closure cost of Cell 2 as a Class I landfill <br /> 4. Estimate the operation and maintenance cost of Cell 2 as a Class I <br /> landfill <br /> 5 . Compute a $/ton cost estimate for construction and operation and <br /> maintenance of Cell 2 as a Class I landfill <br /> JR70184 7 7/13/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.