My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-348.C
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-348.C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 2:23:02 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 7:10:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
12/16/2003
Control Number
2003-348.C
Agenda Item Number
11.I.4
Entity Name
Barth Construction
Subject
Contract and Specifications Kitching Station Trailhead
Area
North County Regional Park
Project Number
0219
Bid Number
5099
Archived Roll/Disk#
3208
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3566
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B . Review of Applications <br /> 4 . Neither ENGINEER' s review of <br /> 1 . ENGINEER will, within 10 days after CONTRACTOR' s Work for the purposes of recom <br /> receipt of each Application for Payment, either mending payments nor ENGINEER' s recommenda- <br /> indicate in writing a recommendation of payment tion of any payment, including final payment, will <br /> and present the Application to OWNER or return the impose responsibility on ENGINEER to supervise, <br /> ' Application to CONTRACTOR indicating in writing direct, or control the Work or for the means, meth" <br /> ENGINEER' s reasons for refusing to recommend ods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of <br /> payment. In the latter case, CONTRACTOR may construction, or the safety precautions and programs <br /> make the necessary corrections and resubmit the incident thereto, or for CONTRACTOR' s failure to <br /> ' Application. comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br /> CONTRACTOR' s performance of the Work. <br /> 2 . ENGINEER' s recommendation of any Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br /> ' payment requested in an Application for Payment not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make <br /> will constitute a representation by ENGINEER to any examination to ascertain how or for what <br /> OWNER, based on ENGINEER' s observations on purposes CONTRACTOR has used the moneys paid <br /> the Site of the executed Work as an experienced and on account of the Contract Price, or to determine <br /> qualified design professional and on ENGINEER's that title to any of the Work, materials, or equipment <br /> review of the Application for Payment and the has passed to OWNER free and clear of any Liens. <br /> accompanying data and schedules, that to the best of <br /> ' ENGINEER' s knowledge, information and belief. 5 . ENGINEER may refuse to recommend <br /> the whole or any part of any payment if, in <br /> a. the Work has progressed to the point ENGINEER' s opinion, it would be incorrect to <br /> indicated; make the representations to OWNER referred to in <br /> ' paragraph 14.02 .B .2. ENGINEER may also refuse <br /> b. the quality of the Work is generally in to recommend any such payment or, because of <br /> accordance with the Contract Documents (sub- subsequently discovered evidence or the results of <br /> ' ject to an evaluation of the Work as a function- subsequent inspections or tests, revise or revoke any <br /> ing whole prior to or upon Substantial Comple- such payment recommendation previously made, to <br /> tion, to the results of any subsequent tests called such extent as may be necessary in ENGINEER' s <br /> for in the Contract Documents, to a final deter- opinion to protect OWNER from loss because: <br /> mination of quantities and classifications for <br /> Unit Price Work under paragraph 9 .08, and to a. the Work is defective, or completed <br /> any other qualifications stated in the Work has been damaged, requiring correction or <br /> ' recommendation); and replacement; <br /> c. the conditions precedent. to b. the Contract Price has been reduced by <br /> CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such pay- Written Amendment or Change Orders; <br /> ment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it <br /> is ENGINEER's responsibility to observe the c. OWNER has been required to correct <br /> Work. defective Work or complete Work in accordance <br /> with paragraph 13 .09; or <br /> 3 . By recommending any such payment <br /> ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have a PiGpigNA L_ _ ROOM4 , _ ___., M__ _C &O, <br /> ' represented that: (i) inspections made to check the gQGuxg=G@ gC aay v the *@at.. e. . .mo A" n, <br /> quality or the quantity of the Work as it has been x'6. 21A. <br /> performed have been exhaustive, extended to every <br /> aspect of the Work in progress, or involved detailed New paragraphs 14.02 .B .5.e and f have been added. <br /> inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> specifically assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract <br /> Documents ; or (ii) that there may not be other Paragraph 14.02.C.1 has been deleted and replaced with <br /> ' matters or issues between the parties that might a new paragraph. See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> entitle CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally by (Note I i, to `:preparers This change is not required for <br /> OWNER or entitle OWNER to withhold payment to private projects.) <br /> CONTRACTOR C. Payment Becomes Due <br /> r00700 - 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.