Laserfiche WebLink
Indian River County, Florida <br /> Management 's Discussion and Analysis <br /> For the Year Ended September 30 , 2003 <br /> property taxes . The strong local economy plus population growth ofthe County contributed to increases in charges <br /> for services . Capital grants/contributions increased significantly due to State and local government grants for the <br /> acquisition ofthe Lost Tree Islands and contributions from Utilities customers . The significant decrease in other <br /> revenues is a direct result of plummeting interest rates , which reduced interest earnings from $9 . 0 million to $5 . 3 <br /> million. Total expenses increased $6 .2 million from the previous year. Increased spending for general government <br /> (financial & administrative costs, other general government costs), public safety (law enforcement, fire protection, <br /> ambulance services), and water and sewer services were primarily responsible for the increase in expenses . <br /> Property taxes provide 43 % of the revenues for Governmental Activities . Most of the Governmental Activities <br /> resources are spent for Public Safety (43 %), General Government ( 19%), Transportation ( 15 %) , and Culture/ <br /> Recreation (8%) activities . <br /> f <br /> As would be expected for Business-type Activities, charges for services provide 62% of the revenues . What is <br /> unusual about the County 's Business-type Activities is the amount of revenue provided by capital grants and <br /> contributions, over 33 % of total revenue . The reason for this is the rapid growth ofthe County's Utilities System, <br /> adding approximately 3 , 000 new users every year. Major developers are required to provide water distribution <br /> and sewer collection systems for their projects and then must donate those systems to the County. Everynew user <br /> is required to pay impact fees , which are used to expand and enhance the system . <br /> FUND FINANCIAL INFORMATION <br /> t <br /> Governmental Funds <br /> General Fund I` <br /> t: <br /> The County's General Fund is the main operating fund ofthe County. It is used to account for all financial resources <br /> that are not restricted by State or Federal laws, County Ordinances or other externally imposed requirements . As <br /> of September 30, 2003 , total assets were $24, 148 , 672 and total liabilities were $4,044 , 557 . The ending fund <br /> balance of $20, 104, 115 represents approximately 30% ofthe budgeted uses of funds for the next fiscal year. Total <br /> sources of funds , $ 74, 852 ,675 , exceeded total uses of funds, $ 72,993 ,285 , by $ 1 , 859, 390 . <br /> During the fiscal year, the County amended the budget in the amount of$2.08 million for Federal and State Grants <br /> (primarily mass transit and stormwater grants) approved during the course of the year and in the amount of $636 <br /> thousand for charges to other governments for the housing of prisoners . Revenues from taxes exceeded the budget <br /> because State law requires that the County budget taxes at 95 % of the total levy and actual collections were <br /> 96 . 0% . Intergovernmental revenues fell short of anticipated since most grants are reimbursable grants and the <br /> County did not incur the expenditures prior to year end. Charges for services exceeded the budget due to service <br /> fees collected by the Sheriff, Tax Collector and Property Appraiser. Interest earnings were less than budgeted <br /> because interest rates were significantly lower than anticipated. Actual expenditures for general government ser- <br /> vices were less than the final approved budget due to vacancies in professional positions , staff turnover, and <br /> operating costs of County buildings being less than anticipated. Actual expenditures for public safety were less than <br /> the final approved budget primarily because of lower operating costs for law enforcement and staffturnover at the <br /> corrections facility. Actual expenditures for physical environment were less than budgeted because grant awards <br /> by the County were not made prior to year-end. Actual expenditures for culture/recreation were less than bud- <br /> geted because due to delays in staffing new recreational facilities . <br /> 6 <br />