My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-417-2of2
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-417-2of2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2016 4:32:45 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 10:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
12/12/2006
Control Number
2006-417
Agenda Item Number
11.I.1.
Entity Name
Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc.
Subject
Oslo Road (CR 606) Phase I, Road Widening
Project Number
9705C
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
5987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
indicate in writing a recommendation of payment tion of any payment, including final payment, will <br /> and present the Application to OWNER or return the impose responsibility on ENGINEER to supervise, <br /> Application to CONTRACTOR indicating in writing direct, or control the Work or for the means, meth- <br /> ENGINEER's reasons for refusing to recommend ods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of <br /> payment. In the latter case, CONTRACTOR may construction, or the safety precautions and programs <br /> make the necessary corrections and resubmit the incident thereto, or for CONTRACTOR's failure to <br /> Application. comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br /> CONTRACTOR's performance of the Work. <br /> 2. ENGINEER's recommendation of any Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br /> payment requested in an Application for Payment not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make <br /> will constitute a representation by ENGINEER to any examination to ascertain how or for what <br /> OWNER, based on ENGINEER's observations on purposes CONTRACTOR has used the moneys paid <br /> the Site of the executed Work as an experienced and on account of the Contract Price, or to determine <br /> qualified design professional and on ENGINEER's that title to any of the Work, materials, or equipment <br /> review of the Application for Payment and the has passed to OWNER free and clear of any Liens. <br /> accompanying data and schedules, that to the best of <br /> ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief: 5. ENGINEER may refuse to recommend <br /> the whole or any part of any payment if, in <br /> a. the Work has progressed to the point ENGINEER's opinion, it would be incorrect to <br /> indicated; make the representations to OWNER referred to in <br /> paragraph 14.02.B.2. ENGINEER may also refuse <br /> b. the quality of the Work is generally in to recommend any such payment or, because of <br /> accordance with the Contract Documents (sub- subsequently discovered evidence or the results of <br /> ject to an evaluation of the Work as a function- subsequent inspections or tests, revise or revoke any <br /> ing whole prior to or upon Substantial Comple- such payment recommendation previously made, to <br /> tion, to the results of any subsequent tests called such extent as may be necessary in ENGINEER's <br /> for in the Contract Documents, to a final deter- opinion to protect OWNER from loss because: <br /> mination of quantities and classifications for <br /> Unit Price Work under paragraph 9.08, and to a. the Work is defective, or completed <br /> any other qualifications stated in the Work has been damaged, requiring correction or <br /> recorrmendation); and replacement; <br /> c. the conditions precedent to b. the Contract Price has been reduced by <br /> CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such pay- Written Amendment or Change Orders; <br /> ment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it <br /> is ENGINEER's responsibility to observe the c. OWNER has been required to correct <br /> Work, defective Work or complete Work in accordance <br /> with paragraph 13 .09; or <br /> 3 . By recommending any such payment <br /> ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have d. ENGINEER has actual knowledge of the <br /> represented that: (i) inspections made to check the occurrence of any of the events enumerated in <br /> quality or the quantity of the Work as it has been paragraph 15.02.A. <br /> performed have been exhaustive, extended to every <br /> aspect of the Work in progress, or involved detailed New paragraphs 14.02.B.5.e and f have been added. <br /> inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> specifically assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract <br /> Documents; or (ii) that there may not be other Paragraph 14.02.C.1 has been deleted and replaced with <br /> matters or issues between the parties that might a new paragraph. See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> entitle CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally by C. Payment Becomes Due <br /> OWNER or entitle OWNER to withhold payment to <br /> CONTRACTOR. 1 . Ten days .a.,_ pfesentation of the <br /> 4. Neither ENGINEER's review of PNGPiEH 's r.,.,.,mEne:d:. o .he ar,�m <br /> CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of recom- (subject <br /> Jn to the . of _.._.. .t_ <br /> r r Y <br /> mending payments nor ENGINEER's recommenda- <br /> 00700 - 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.