Laserfiche WebLink
SJRWMD Stormwater Management Projects Cost-Sharing Application Form 2005-2006 <br /> EVALUATION FACTOR related to question B-9 : <br /> Is the project a cooperative effort with one or more other organizations or agencies ? Are other <br /> cooperative funds being contributed? What funds are being contributed to the project, and are they <br /> enc1.."tiered, are they budgeted, or have they been awarded? 0 or 5 points . Funds encumbered./listed in <br /> a budget or grant awarded = 5 points; funds asked for/grant requested = 0. <br /> B40. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water quality, such as <br /> improving or protecting groundwater, increasing recharge, conserving water, or providing flood <br /> protection ? Yes ® No [:] <br /> If yes , then describe benefits . <br /> To a limited degree the project may increase recharge since some of the water will be retained in the <br /> roadside Swale system and percolate into the goundwater . <br /> EVALUATION FACTOR related to question B40 . <br /> Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water quality, such as improving <br /> or protecting groundwater, increasing recharge, conserving water, or providing flood protection? 0-5 <br /> points . Scoring is based on rater 's assessment of the extent and significance of additional benefits. <br /> C . OTHER EVALUATION FACTORS <br /> C4 . Rater' s evaluation. 0- 10 points . Rater 's overall assessment and other relevant factors not <br /> specifically addressed elsewhere. <br /> C-2 . Has the applicant followed directions as instructed in preparing the application? [- 5 ]-0 points . <br /> Points will be taken away from an applicant ' s score for failure to follow directions . Noncompliance, <br /> and/or the applicant included a large amount of unnecessary information = (-I — -S) ; the applicant <br /> followed directions and included just the relevant information required = 0. <br /> AJ <br />