My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-259
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 10:31:53 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 9:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Application
Approved Date
08/02/2005
Control Number
2005-259
Agenda Item Number
7.U.
Entity Name
St. Johns Water Management District
Subject
Road Paving - Indian River Lagoon
Application Fiscal Year 2005-2006
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
5108
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SJRWMD Stormwater Management Projects Cost-Sharing Application Form 2005-2006 <br /> EVALUATION FACTOR related to question B-9 : <br /> Is the project a cooperative effort with one or more other organizations or agencies ? Are other <br /> cooperative funds being contributed? What funds are being contributed to the project, and are they <br /> enc1.."tiered, are they budgeted, or have they been awarded? 0 or 5 points . Funds encumbered./listed in <br /> a budget or grant awarded = 5 points; funds asked for/grant requested = 0. <br /> B40. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water quality, such as <br /> improving or protecting groundwater, increasing recharge, conserving water, or providing flood <br /> protection ? Yes ® No [:] <br /> If yes , then describe benefits . <br /> To a limited degree the project may increase recharge since some of the water will be retained in the <br /> roadside Swale system and percolate into the goundwater . <br /> EVALUATION FACTOR related to question B40 . <br /> Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water quality, such as improving <br /> or protecting groundwater, increasing recharge, conserving water, or providing flood protection? 0-5 <br /> points . Scoring is based on rater 's assessment of the extent and significance of additional benefits. <br /> C . OTHER EVALUATION FACTORS <br /> C4 . Rater' s evaluation. 0- 10 points . Rater 's overall assessment and other relevant factors not <br /> specifically addressed elsewhere. <br /> C-2 . Has the applicant followed directions as instructed in preparing the application? [- 5 ]-0 points . <br /> Points will be taken away from an applicant ' s score for failure to follow directions . Noncompliance, <br /> and/or the applicant included a large amount of unnecessary information = (-I — -S) ; the applicant <br /> followed directions and included just the relevant information required = 0. <br /> AJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.