My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-195
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2004
>
2004-195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2016 1:06:01 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 7:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Application
Approved Date
08/17/2004
Control Number
2004-195
Agenda Item Number
9.A.1
Entity Name
Bureau of Community Development
Department of Community Affairs
CVS Distribution Center
Subject
Grant Application Water and sewer facilities and road improvement
Area
98th Ave. and SR 60
Archived Roll/Disk#
3223
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4239
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Mosley understood Hugh Turner had not been awarded any bids . Mr. <br /> Rohani responded Mr. Turner was doing four of the seven homes currently being <br /> completed , as well as five of the houses to be demolished in the future . <br /> Mr . Mosley wanted to be able to speak with the contractors at the next <br /> CDBG Citizen Advisory Task Force meeting . Mr . Idlette pointed out the <br /> contractors had 90 days to complete the jobs , and the committee had no grounds <br /> for complaint since it had not been 90 days yet . <br /> Mr. Rohani stated the bright side of the process was each of the recipients <br /> received $ 30 , 000 to $40 , 000 worth of rehabilitation on their homes , and he <br /> suggested members point that out when hearing any complaints . <br /> Mr. Rohani said he would request both David Fox and the contractors <br /> attend the next meeting . Chairman Lyles did not want to stop the work of the <br /> contractors , and advised she would be satisfied with a status report as far as start <br /> dates , works in progress , and estimated completion dates . Mr. Rohani agreed <br /> that was a better idea . <br /> There was a brief conversation regarding # 13 through # 17 on the Client <br /> List Update dated July 20 , 2004 . <br /> Mr. Idlette requested clarification Hugh Turner had the low bid for all five <br /> demolition and replacement projects . Mr. Rohani replied positively . Mr. Idlette <br /> wanted to know if Hugh Turner had 90 days to complete all five homes , or 90 <br /> days per house . Mr. Rohani said staff had also been concerned Hugh Turner <br /> was taking on too much , however they had been assured by Mr. Turner all five <br /> jobs would be completed . Mr. Idlette commented Mr. Turner would be penalized <br /> if he did not meet the deadlines . <br /> There was a discussion about how many houses could be fixed with the <br /> funds available . <br /> Discussion and Comments <br /> There were none . <br /> Adiournment <br /> There being no further business , the meeting adjourned at 5 : 16 p . m . <br /> CDBG/Unapproved 5 August 9, 2004 <br /> F :\Community Development\Users\CDBG\2004 FD\The Grant Application\Appendix H - CATF Min080904 . doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.