My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-136
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-136
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2016 12:18:29 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
04/19/2005
Control Number
2005-136
Agenda Item Number
11.I.3
Entity Name
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Agency
Subject
DEP Agreement No. G0143 Grant Awards
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4876
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a . If the failure is reported to be due to sample matrix interference , the laboratory shall document the <br /> process by which this conclusion is determined . <br /> 6 . Evaluation of Laboratory Duplicate/Replicate Samples — All replicate samples (sample duplicates , <br /> matrix spike duplicates , LCS duplicates or other replicates ) must be evaluated for a precision criterion <br /> not to exceed 20 % RPD . This criterion shall be listed in the planning document . <br /> a . In the event that laboratory replicate agreement is not observed , the laboratory must investigate <br /> the poor precision and report the results with appropriate qualifiers and/or comments . <br /> 7 . Instrument Calibration — In addition to calibration procedures specified in the analytical methods listed <br /> in the planning document, the GRANTEE shall ensure that the following requirements are met : <br /> a . All sample results shall be chronologically bracketed between acceptable calibration verifications . <br /> b . Initial Calibration Requirements <br /> ( i ) The minimum number of calibration standards required to calibrate each instrument used for <br /> the contracted analyses shall conform to the analytical method approved in the planning <br /> document . If the minimum number of calibration standards is not specified in the method , the <br /> number must be specified in the planning document and shall be consistent with the NELAC <br /> Chapter 5 standards . <br /> ( ii ) Unless otherwise specified by the method , all sample results shall be based on the initial <br /> calibration curve responses . <br /> ( iii ) If linear regressions are used , the correlation coefficient shall be equal to or greater than <br /> 0 . 995 for all regressions . <br /> ( iv) Immediately after performing an initial calibration , the accuracy of the calibration shall be <br /> verified using a second source . A second source may be a standard , a Standard Reference <br /> Material (SRM ) , or other sample type with a verified concentration such as a QC Check <br /> Sample . Standards must have been prepared from a different lot or vendor. <br /> (v) The acceptance criteria for second -source verifications shall be specified in the planning <br /> document . <br /> (vi ) Sample analysis cannot proceed if an initial calibration is unacceptable . <br /> c . Continuing Calibration Requirements : <br /> ( i ) When an initial calibration is not performed on the day of analysis , a continuing calibration <br /> standard shall be analyzed , evaluated and determined to be acceptable prior to analyzing <br /> samples . <br /> ( ii ) A continuing calibration standard shall be analyzed and evaluated at the end of the analytical <br /> run . <br /> ( iii ) The acceptance criteria for continuing calibration verifications shall be specified in the <br /> planning document. <br /> ( iv) For each analytical run , the analytical sensitivity must be evaluated using a continuing <br /> calibration standard prepared at the Agreement-specified PQL . The analyzed value of this <br /> standard must be within 70 % — 130 % of the expected value . If this PQL check fails , the blank <br /> and associated sample results must be reported as "estimated" per Chapter 62- 160 , F . A. C . <br /> unless the affected results are at least 10 times the absolute value of the observed bias of the <br /> PQL check . <br /> (v) If a continuing calibration verification fails , samples not chronologically bracketed by <br /> acceptable calibration verifications must be reanalyzed or appropriately qualified . <br /> d . Sample results below the Agreement-specified PQL and above the highest calibration standard <br /> shall be appropriately qualified . <br /> 8 . Quality Control Blanks <br /> a . If a Contracted analyte is detected in any analytical QC blank , the sample results that <br /> are <br /> associated with the blank must be reported with the appropriate qualifier from Chapter 62- 160 , <br /> F .A. C . , unless the affected sample concentrations are at least 10 times higher than the calculated <br /> QC blank concentration . <br /> b . Sample results must be chronologically bracketed with acceptable beginning and ending <br /> analytical QC blanks . <br /> C . If a Contracted analyte is detected in the field blank , equipment blank or trip blank , the result must <br /> be confirmed by reanalyzing a new aliquot of the blank unless the sample concentration results <br /> Revised 3/05 <br /> DEP Agreement No . GO 143 , Attachment H, Page 9 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.