My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-118
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 4:32:14 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 9:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Correspondence
Approved Date
04/04/2006
Control Number
2006-118
Agenda Item Number
13.B.1.
Entity Name
William Luke, Ann Bergland, Winnie Whitney, Bob Smith
Subject
emails from supporters of Commissioner Wheeler's Straw Ballot
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
5586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br />Kimberly Massung <br />From: William Luke [BLUKEJ@comcast.net] <br />Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:33 AM <br />To: Sandra L. Bowden <br />Subject: URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARY PROPOSED BALLOT QUESTION <br />Dear Commissioner Bowden, <br />Because of the information below provided from public information and public record I feel it is <br />absolutely necessary that the Board of County Commissioners approve this proposed ballot <br />question for the November General Election: <br />"Do you favor the adoption of a special act for Indian River County by the Florida Legislature to <br />require voter approval of any amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan which <br />expands the urban service boundary? <br />The county spent $200,000 (not counting staff time) on a visioning process which included dozens <br />of county -wide meetings at which the public strongly opposed the Village or New Town concept. <br />County Commissioners voted unanimously and vocally endorsed the visioning team's <br />recommendation to prohibit Villages or New Towns to be built outside of the Urban Service Area. <br />However, six hours prior to a final vote and after having been heavily lobbied by eight citrus <br />growers, four Commissioners REVERSED their position and voted to allow them. <br />Twice, March 15 and May 24,2004, the Board of County Commission unanimously voted in support <br />of Wheeler's approach to protect the Urban Service Area by the voter referendum. Then after <br />heavy lobbying, three Commissioners reversed their position. <br />We have a population of 130,000 people now in the county and can grow to approximately 300,000 <br />people in the Urban Service Area in its present boundary. If we expand the Urban Service Area we <br />will have hundreds of thousand more people living here creating the same type of sprawl that <br />exists in South Florida. <br />It is very clear from the City of Vero Beach recent election, the voters are in favor of controlled and <br />managed growth. The 83,000 voters in Indian River County are too big in number be lobbied <br />and/or pressured into a decission for special interest groups such as the Citrus League, <br />realtors and the big developers. Therefore the voters, not the politicians, must have the power to <br />approve any changes which expand the Urban Service Boundary. <br />I strongly urge you to vote in favor of the proposed ballot question. <br />Thank you very much, <br />Bill Luke <br />2030 Club Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32963 <br />4/3/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.